Babe Ruth 1934 Tour of Japan Card

[glchen]

The image looks like it's from the JBR166. However, the picture quality isn't close, so I'm also skeptical of the authenticity of this.

[Hankphenom]

Don't think I've heard that term before.

[prestigecollectibles]

Originally Posted by Hankphenom

Don't think I've heard that term before.

Here you go
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromid...anese_culture)

[prestigecollectibles]

That seller often has sketchy items. That could be cut from something or just a fantasy piece. If it was real it would've been bought already.

[Exhibitman]

Originally Posted by prestigecollectibles

That seller often has sketchy items. That could be cut from something or just a fantasy piece. If it was real it would've been bought already.

That is the definitive answer from the go-to guy. No need to look further.

[Snapolit1]

Originally Posted by prestigecollectibles

That seller often has sketchy items. That could be cut from something or just a fantasy piece. If it was real it would've been bought already.

Have saved myself a lot of money and aggravation over the years with that logic. Lots of eyes on all of this stuff. Particularly Ruth. If something is gathering dust in the corner its for a reason.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Have saved myself a lot of money and aggravation over the years with that logic. Lots of eyes on all of this stuff. Particularly Ruth. If something is gathering dust in the corner its for a reason.

+1. A real great item, at a good price, won't last long.
.

[Leon]

[/B]

Originally Posted by glchen

The image looks like it's from the JBR166. However, the picture quality isn't close, so I'm also skeptical of the authenticity of this.

What a great postcard!!
.

[bjacky]

Yes, this is what I reference too in my post. I have seen this with a letter of authenticity from PSA saying the picture is most-likely from the original negative but printed at a later time like around the 70s, so the card could be the same scenario, an authorized re-print which should hold the same value as the photos.

[bigfanNY]

Originally Posted by bjacky

Yes, this is what I reference too in my post. I have seen this with a letter of authenticity from PSA saying the picture is most-likely from the original negative but printed at a later time like around the 70s, so the card could be the same scenario, an authorized re-print which should hold the same value as the photos.

NO, you are not listening to what others have said.this is not I repeat N O T from the original negative. So it would NOT hold the same value as the photo.