![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want an 8, I'd surely wait. Both of those cards are irksome, both for the grade and how they present regardless.
What's going on with the bottom corner of the SGC? Unidentifiable detritus? Common printer's mark of which I wasn't aware? More things going on with them? For all the aspects which would trouble me with those two cards, I have to imagine there are countless examples even three grades lower which I would find much more aesthetically pleasing, but that's just me. Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 09-13-2024 at 03:31 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would pass on both regardless of the price.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep. Thought that was likely the case.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Choosing between the two options? The SGC all day long.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Ya, I agree. I would pass on both of these copies. That said, the SGC 8 is the far superior card of the two above. I would wait for a centered copy to surface in a lower grade, personally. Although then you'd probably find yourself competing against me if you found one lol.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here are a few of mine. I would much rather buy 3 of these than one of those.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. Last edited by Snowman; 09-13-2024 at 03:51 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. Yeah, it's coming back to me the more I stare at it. My hobby focus has been off (unsigned) cards for over 30 years, so a lot of that old knowledge I used to carry around was clearly pushed aside to make room for information more relevant to my side of things!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Between the two 8's listed I'd take the SGC. The centering kills it for me on the PSA card even though the registration is a little better on the PSA. Ultimately for the kind of money these will bring I'd probably wait for a better copy to come up.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC is clearly the better copy
PSA example has that printers mark/defect on top of hat and is not centered with slight skew to the right
__________________
Tony Collecting: 1909-1911 T206 Southern Leaguers 1914 Cracker Jack Set (94 out of 145) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sadly, with my budget, this is completely out of my milieu, but if you need help choosing the better bargain between a PSA 5 and an SGC 5 1973 Topps Willie Montanez, I am definitely your man!!!!
![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd hold off and wait for a better looking 8 if I was set on an 8.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Im not OK with the dramatic tilt on the top of the sgc card and not as much at the bottom.
That would irk me until I sold it That psa 8 looks like an old flip that was cleansed into a new flip. Hard pass on both here, more so at the precipice of the market IMO
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. Last edited by Snowman; 09-13-2024 at 05:10 PM. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AJ- I'd go with the SGC by a hair. Amazing the number of folks who reply
while ignoring your direct question. You can lead a horse to water... Trent King |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC crushes in my opinion
That said, I don’t like the picture tilt for that grade, and as others stated, I would pass and wait for a better centered one, especially in an 8 Last edited by Rhotchkiss; 09-14-2024 at 08:08 AM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a very slight preference for the type 2, but the market values them equivalently and I'd never pass on a type 1 that fits my centering and condition criteria
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes it's like the Mantle, which was double printed with slight differences between the versions.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB/WTT for 1952 topps Jackie Robinson, 1951 and 52 bowman Mantle and Jackie- also in | Yellowstonesportscards | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2023 12:20 PM |
Perfectly centered and registered '48 Leaf Jackie Robinson, Dimaggio, '49 Jackie | Sean1125 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-24-2021 09:35 PM |
1952 BerkRoss Musial PSA 7, 53 Jackie PSA 4, 55 Golden Stamps Koufax Jackie PSA 9 | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-25-2018 12:13 PM |
Happy Bday Jackie! Show your favorite Jackie items | JoeyFarino | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 18 | 02-06-2016 09:20 AM |
1953 Topps Lot (78 cards): 2 Jackie Robinson's / Campy $390 *Another Jackie added* | sycks22 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 14 | 11-01-2011 08:47 PM |