Typical Ebay...

[edtiques]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

Interesting issue . . . .

Many people post on the board often that the "opinion sellers" don't know what they are doing and how often they are wrong. There was a post recently about people complaining that autographs they got in person of HOFs came back unverified.

Why should a seller have to take the word of PSA that something is "not likely genuine"?

Not trying to pick a fight, and I am glad you got your refund.

I understand what you're saying. I'm 100% sure PSA makes mistakes. I'm not a autograph guy so I figured their opinion was probably better than mine. That's the reason I used them.
I was under the impression that if an item was deemed "Not Likely" by PSA that you couldn't list it. If that's the case, they should have removed the listing.
I could be wrong about that though.

[SyrNy1960]

Years ago, I used PSA’s Quick Opinion service, where the item came back “likely not genuine.” Bought it, submitted it to PSA, came back authentic.

[gonefishin]

The quick opinion from authenticators is just a simple way to make $10 to $20 bucks without doing anything except looking at your item. Easy money.

[SyrNy1960]

Originally Posted by gonefishin

The quick opinion from authenticators is just a simple way to make $10 to $20 bucks without doing anything except looking at your item. Easy money.

Bingo! 🤑🤑🤑

[coletonye671]

Originally Posted by gonefishin

The quick opinion from authenticators is just a simple way to make $10 to $20 bucks without doing anything except looking at your item. Easy money.

Nursk

[ooo-ribay]

Originally Posted by gonefishin

The quick opinion from authenticators is just a simple way to make $10 to $20 bucks without doing anything except looking at your item. Easy money.

Everything they do is easy money.