![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Unless I am looking at this the wrong way, what incentive is there for Nat to put money into a combined registry? It makes SGC cards more valuable in the market but isn't he in essence just competing against himself?
I prefer SGC to PSA but I must be lacking the long distance vision to see how Collectors benefits by having two separate grading brands. My assumption has been that at some point SGC either gets sold off or folds into PSA.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Combined into another post. | iwantitiwinit | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-21-2023 04:47 PM |
combined threads | camaro69 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 5 | 07-24-2020 06:28 PM |
combined threads | camaro69 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 07-05-2020 06:41 AM |
OT: Phillies combined No-No | Michael Peich | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-02-2014 04:01 PM |
CJ 14s: No Combined SGC/PSA Pop Report? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-07-2014 10:42 PM |