![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Step 1. PSA buys SGC at a valuation based on SGC not having a competitive set registry (which is a major determinant of company value).
Step 2. PSA decrees SGC graded cards are equivalent to PSA's for set registry purposes, and the PSA set registry becomes a PSA/SGC set registry. Step 3. The valuation of SGC skyrockets. Conclusion: A brillant business plan, on par to PSA's original creation of their set registry. Disclosure: The great majority of my graded cards are SGC-graded (because I think on balance they are better graders), so I would be delighted if this is how it plays out. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Combined into another post. | iwantitiwinit | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-21-2023 04:47 PM |
combined threads | camaro69 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 5 | 07-24-2020 06:28 PM |
combined threads | camaro69 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 07-05-2020 06:41 AM |
OT: Phillies combined No-No | Michael Peich | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-02-2014 04:01 PM |
CJ 14s: No Combined SGC/PSA Pop Report? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-07-2014 10:42 PM |