![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would guess that a (very, very) large percentage of the cards that have been cracked out and resubmitted have never had their old labels sent in by the owners to be 'processed' (for lack of a better word) and the Cert Numbers removed from the pop reports.
With 'regular' value cards that have pops in the hundreds or thousands, there isn't much motivation to send the labels back in to the TPG. Removing a single PSA 6 from the pop of 685 PSA 6s doesn't have any impact, so why even bother. And with 'high' value cards, I would imagine many/most people who resubmit them would like to hold onto the old labels just to have a full history of a card's journey, whether or not they want that info for when they eventually sell it.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The same card realistically has a chance to be originally graded out as an SGC. Years later when PSA was selling for way more they cracked and submitted to PSA where even at a bit lower grade they were going to make more. Then later on the buyer who owned it says "no way that's a 3" and sent it back to SGC for a new grade. Potentially 3 pop reports for 1 card. And that's not to mention the cards that are sent in multiple times in a row trying to get the correct grade. Or the cards purchased in lower grades by card doctors and then cracked out and altered ( ![]() There's a lot of pieces at play with this grading system and (for the most part) it wouldn't be a problem if the old labels were sent back in to the TPG's for removal from their reports. Just how many people consistently do that (if at all) is the question. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone have anything i need. Paying substantial rewards | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 06-23-2023 08:59 PM |
How do you really know the true psa population? | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 07-11-2012 01:30 PM |
"TRUE" population of a card | zljones | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-27-2012 01:08 PM |
True Population of the 1914 Mathewson | jboosted92 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-01-2009 05:44 PM |
Recent Inheritance / Find - Nothing Substantial - Few ?'s | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-13-2008 09:21 PM |