1970 7th Series B/Left side slit

[deweyinthehall]

In the Roland above, he has to be over either McDowell or McBean - I think McDowell matches a bit better, and when you look at McBean, the Y in "YEAR" seems too close to the edge to not be seen in the miscut.

Not sure enough to call it for McDowell though, yet.

[deweyinthehall]

Duncan is over Fisher is the only top row card that matches.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by deweyinthehall

Duncan is over Fisher is the only top row card that matches.

I have Duncan over Fairly, the front of the miscut Duncan has the card under it with a dark top edge, Fairly has a dark photo top and Fisher has a light blue sky photo top.

[deweyinthehall]

My bad - you are correct. This gives us Fairly, ?, Lucchesi and Duncan needing one more for a column.

[deweyinthehall]

Jose Pagan is over Jimmie Hall

[Kevvyg1026]

Originally Posted by deweyinthehall

Jose Pagan is over Jimmie Hall

Since neither Pagan nor Hall has a white line, that make Pagan a row 2 card (Tepedino leader) and Hall a row 3 card (Stewart leader)

[Cliff Bowman]

I figured the Ward would be an easy match but it can still be Meyer, Bertaina, McFadden, or Roland and I can't figure out which one it is. I guess it will have to be through elimination. ETA, Roland has been eliminated so that leaves Meyer, Bertaina, and McFadden.

[Cliff Bowman]

We are going to have most if not all of the four card columns before long but no way of knowing the order of most of the columns.

[deweyinthehall]

I think it's Bertaina:

1) the top of the yellow field on McFadden is too low
2) The blue type on Meyer is so close to the edge that it should be partly visible
3) I think Roland doesn't line up as well as Bertaina

Take another look and let me know what you think

[Kevvyg1026]

Why is Bertaina eliminated as being below Ward? Ward is a row 4 card, Bertainia is a row 1 card. I've seen some miscuts of Lolich that, although not definitive, suggest it might be a RE card.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by Kevvyg1026

Why is Bertaina eliminated as being below Ward? Ward is a row 4 card, Bertainia is a row 1 card. I've seen some miscuts of Lolich that, although definitive, suggest it might be a RE card.

I don't remember, I probably confused it with another card. I'll go back and edit that post.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by Kevvyg1026

Why is Bertaina eliminated as being below Ward? Ward is a row 4 card, Bertainia is a row 1 card. I've seen some miscuts of Lolich that, although definitive, suggest it might be a RE card.

I believe you are right, I tried the Ward miscut to Bertaina again and it's a perfect fit. Good thing you caught that. So that means the Bertaina column of

Bertaina
Billingham
Lolich
Ward

is the RE 11th column.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by deweyinthehall

In the Roland above, he has to be over either McDowell or McBean - I think McDowell matches a bit better, and when you look at McBean, the Y in "YEAR" seems too close to the edge to not be seen in the miscut.

Not sure enough to call it for McDowell though, yet.

Just now saw this post again, I agree with you that it is McDowell under Roland.

[Cliff Bowman]

I'm thinking this has to be McBean under Jack Fisher.

[deweyinthehall]

FYI - As it stands there are 8 cards for which we know absolutely nothing:

Jerry Robertson
Jim Hardin
Rich Rollins (this guy is also part of the 1966 6th series - can't get away from him!)
Frank Robinson
Dalton Jones
Al McBean
Jose Cardenal
Tom Haller

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by deweyinthehall

FYI - As it stands there are 8 cards for which we know absolutely nothing:

Jerry Robertson
Jim Hardin
Rich Rollins (this guy is also part of the 1966 6th series - can't get away from him!)
Frank Robinson
Dalton Jones
Al McBean
Jose Cardenal
Tom Haller

.

[Cliff Bowman]

Pretty sure that is Reichardt under Robertson, I will need to double check and make sure it's not Dalton Jones or Collins. ETA after comparing Collins and Dalton Jones I'm convinced it is Reichardt under Robertson.

[deweyinthehall]

And I am convinced it is Rich Rollins under Frank Robinson...

[deweyinthehall]

I agree it's Reichardt under Robertson as well - I couldn't decide between Collins or Reichardt, but the stat line type setting in Reichardt fits the patter.