![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Cracker Jack's are a solid choice. Each year singularly makes it less the choice. Maybe put both 1914 & 1915 together. After that, I would consider the 1941 Playball's, but no Ruth, Cobb or Gehrig hurts.
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
N172 really could be done with one image per subject minus west coast players. I'd also argue that rarity is what makes a set great. If 100's of people can complete it with just "dollars" then it's just not as special.
While maybe not as well known as the 34 (err 33) Goudey Lajoie, there is absolutely an iconic card in the Anson in Uniform. When is the last time you saw a public sale of one of those?? First comprehensive baseball card set, Pioneers of the game, Multiple player poses including action and portraits, Actual photographic images...hands down best set of all time. (T206 and 1914 CJ round out my top 3) Last edited by Schwertfeger1007; 06-24-2024 at 12:31 AM. |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
my choice...
To me, N172 IS 19th Century baseball. I only have a few but that would be my choice. . ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 06-26-2024 at 08:19 PM. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess I'm torn between the 1887-90 OJs (N172) and the 1914 (or 15) CJs. .......
Maybe the other set should be something since 1952... Not sure what though. I thought the first Upper Deck set ('89) was significant at the time but 35 years later I can't really get that excited about it. The 53 Bowman Coior set is great too but its only a year after the '52 Topps and it's missing some of the biggest names of the era (Jackie Robinson, Ted Williams and Willie Mays)... |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Big Five ! Big Five ! Big Five ! 🙂
They are both worthy |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Cracker Jack sets would be my choice for a fourth one.
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Just give people a few more years for reflection and to let the set age a little longer. For the impact it had to the modern collecting era, I have to imagine that '89 UD will one day stand alongside the big guns. I personally take issue as a vintage diehard but completely understand why it will have eventually earned such a legacy. |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1948 Leaf - the first integrated card set, first color set post WWII, lots of HOFers and mythology around the printing issues and SP's, great iconic rookie cards, the list goes on.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------- Signed Jackie Robinson Run: 4/8 (needs: 48L, 49B, 52T, 56T). Signed 1948 / 1949 Leaf Baseball Set: 56/98. (needs: 8,13,19,22,30,33,36,43,45,55,57,62,65,66,68,70,78, 79,81,93,95,104,108,113,121,123,129,131,137,142,14 3,144,146,153,159,160,161,163,165,168) https://www.flickr.com/photos/198641438@N03/albums/ --not always up to date |
#61
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For Big Four, I would include Cracker Jack (both '14 and '15 since they are pretty similar). Maybe Cracker Jack would already be considered one of the Big sets if they were more accessible/common. The other Big 3 sets have large Populations.
Runner ups would be '53 Bowman (trailblazing full color with actual, gorgeous pictures) and '55 Topps (first major horizontal, and it has some important rookies including Clemente and Koufax). |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My first thought weas N172's with the Cracker Jack sets a close 2nd
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My parameters:
1. A set on the larger side with nationwide presence. Nothing small. 2. Emblematic & representatitve of its era. 3. Caught the country by storm. 4. Can not be issued too closely to one of the preexisting "Big 3" due to too much player/era crossover. I have no interest in the inclusion of another 1950's or 1910s issue. I absolutely love the looks of CJs, and so many of the 1950's Topps and Bowman issues, but they can't really surpass the sheer monstrosity of what T206 and 1952 did for the hobby and continue to do to this day. Consider them the gateway drugs to their respective eras. Speaking of 1950's Topps issues, I don't think anyone has mentioned the 1957 set. Quite surprising. Photo quality, player selection and strandardizing modern card size for decades to come. Regardless, I wouldn't vote for them over the '52s even though I like them more. |
#64
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Seeking very scarce/rare cards for my Sam Rice master collection, e.g., E210 York Caramel Type 2 (upgrade), 1931 W502, W504 (upgrade), W572 sepia, W573, 1922 Haffner's Bread, 1922 Keating Candy, 1922 Witmor Candy Type 2 (vertical back), 1926 Sports Co. of Am. with ad & blank backs. Also 1917 Merchants Bakery & Weil Baking cards of WaJo. Also E222 cards of Lipe, Revelle & Ryan. |
#65
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Although I love the N172’s, I’d have to sat the combined 14/15 Cracker Jacks.
__________________
Looking for affordable T205 Hoblitzell no stats; also any T206 Drum |
#66
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Those are some really nice Leafs....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VCP adding modern | BobbyVCP | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 10 | 06-12-2018 11:53 PM |
Adding context and meaning..... | vintagesportscollector | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 9 | 12-21-2016 11:38 AM |
Thank You for adding to our experience at The National! | Tim Kindler | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 08-09-2011 08:19 AM |
What does everyone think about adding another section to the BST? | IronHorse2130 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 16 | 03-12-2010 01:22 PM |
adding a picture | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-01-2006 07:47 PM |