PSA boo boo .. 1941 Goudey

[Leon]

I have a similar type miscut, and it's a miscut.
.

[BillyCoxDodgers3B]

That slab looks to be on the old side. Maybe somebody who studies these things can provide an actual date.

[swarmee]

Graded like 20 years ago, but if you send it back in they'll add (MC) to it to make you happy.

[brianp-beme]

I am always good for a 1941 Goudey miscut image or two.

Brian

[bobbyw8469]

I'm confused. It is still Bill Dietrich. The name matches the image. Could it be possible that some variations had the name on the top instead of the bottom?

[bobbyw8469]

Here is another name on top variation that got the qualifier because it shows the border and too much yellow above it.....

[G1911]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

I'm confused. It is still Bill Dietrich. The name matches the image. Could it be possible that some variations had the name on the top instead of the bottom?

No. It’s just the same card printed above itself on the sheet; so that a miscut can show the ‘right name’ like most T206’s. Not a variation. You can see in other 1941 miscuts that this is so.

[brianp-beme]

Originally Posted by G1911

No. It’s just the same card printed above itself on the sheet; so that a miscut can show the ‘right name’ like most T206’s. Not a variation. You can see in other 1941 miscuts that this is so.

Greg is correct. The two 1941 Goudey cards I shared in post #6 would have the same name at the bottom of the card if they weren't so squinkingly miscut at the time of their production.

I assume the OP was referring to the fact that this card did not receive (MC) qualifier because the grader probably didn't realize that a properly cut card would have the name/team designation at the bottom.

I give this slab a 'D' grade.


Brian (when I grade graders performance there is no such thing as a sliding scale)