Memory Lane sold cards they didn't have per SCD

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by ClementeFanOh

A disclaimer and a few points-

Disclaimer- I have no affiliation with ML and the involved cards.

1) I hate that some net54 folks were impacted as consignors, truly.

2) ML's solution to the mess they created seems more than a little bit
Machiavellian to me. If I had a dog in the fight, my feelings would
surely be stronger. Really odd that, at barest minimum, they've issued
no statement on their site.

3) Speaking of dogs in the fight... Does anyone else find it absurd/amusing
that 3 of net54's biggest blowhards, who apparently have no such dogs
in this fight, can't stop tearing at each other's throats in this thread? It's
a bit like watching chimps in action at the local zoo, hurling feces while
onlookers think, "I'm glad there's glass between us". Congrats to G1911,
RepublicaninMass, and Peter Spaeth- you've outdone yourselves. Sad...

Trent King

As to 2) Why do they owe you a statement? They have notified the consignors and the winners of the stolen lots...you know...the people who were adversely impacted by the theft. Any statement they issue would be total BS. Do you like BS?

As to 3) Not taking sides but no I do not find it absurd those 3 members were debating this matter. And those 3 are not the ones I would describe as a blowhard.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Lorewalker

As to 2) Why do they owe you a statement? They have notified the consignors and the winners of the stolen lots...you know...the people who were adversely impacted by the theft. Any statement they issue would be total BS. Do you like BS?

As to 3) Not taking sides but no I do not find it absurd those 3 members were debating this matter. And those 3 are not the ones I would describe as a blowhard.

You don't think Trent is as superior as he postures? Hmmm.

[ClementeFanOh]

Lorewalker-

I'm stunned to see your reading comprehension skills haven't improved.

1) I didn't write that ML "owed" me a statement. I wrote that it's strange
they are remaining silent on the site. Surely some mention of a 2 million
dollar theft on their watch is worthy of a footnote?

2) If you call what those 3 have been doing a "debate", then your definition
of that term is different than mine. It's just name calling and repetition,
massive ego vs massive ego.

I hope things are going well for you in lovely Oakland.

Trent King

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by ClementeFanOh

1) I didn't write that ML "owed" me a statement. I wrote that it's strange
they are remaining silent on the site. Surely some mention of a 2 million
dollar theft on their watch is worthy of a footnote?

I am not sure you can bid in an auction like ML's but when you can and then when you can run an auction house like ML, you can issue statements when you have lapses in judgement. Why do they need to make a statement? It is all over the internet? They are in contact with the parties who matter. You are not part of a party that matters, trust me on that one.

Originally Posted by ClementeFanOh

2) If you call what those 3 have been doing a "debate", then your definition
of that term is different than mine. It's just name calling and repetition,
massive ego vs massive ego.

I disagree and find all three members to be valued members who, unlike you, have plenty to offer the community. And you would not be able to identify a debate. You only know how to insult people.

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by Lorewalker

As to 2) Why do they owe you a statement? They have notified the consignors and the winners of the stolen lots...you know...the people who were adversely impacted by the theft. Any statement they issue would be total BS. Do you like BS?

As to 3) Not taking sides but no I do not find it absurd those 3 members were debating this matter. And those 3 are not the ones I would describe as a blowhard.

"Keep my (user) name out cha mouth"

I Just find it amusing, as I posted, people with no skin in the game are pontificating on their soap box about legalese and ramifications when they are fit to manage a men's room at a bus station. Again, ML likely relied on advice from legal or insurance, any other opinion is just that. Here to wit, an opinion and 5 bucks will get you a cold press in Brooklyn.

[ClementeFanOh]

RepublicaninMass- you are too stupid to insult, truly. You are also gullible.
I'll stop now, a mere 27 posts behind you in this thread I maintain my
original comments about net54 members who have been impacted.

Trent King

[MikeGarcia]

.. Card

..

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by ClementeFanOh

RepublicaninMass- you are too stupid to insult, truly. You are also gullible.
I'll stop now, a mere 27 posts behind you in this thread I maintain my
original comments about net54 members who have been impacted.

Trent King

"Trent ..no function
Beer
Well without "

[ClementeFanOh]

Lorewalker-

Let me get this straight. You couldn't follow a direct statement I made,
then accused me of failing to recognize a debate. Sure, sounds lucid to me...

I'll amend my original blowhard count in this thread to 4. Think you can
figure out who I've added? Or is that beyond your comprehension as well?
On second thought, never mind. (It may just be that you are the party who
doesn't matter, Chachi.)

Trent King

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by ClementeFanOh

Lorewalker-

Let me get this straight. You couldn't follow a direct statement I made,
then accused me of failing to recognize a debate. Sure, sounds lucid to me...

I'll amend my original blowhard count in this thread to 4. Think you can
figure out who I've added? Or is that beyond your comprehension as well?
On second thought, never mind. (It may just be that you are the party who
doesn't matter, Chachi.)

Trent King

And YOU are complaining about people throwing stuff at each other? LOL hysterical. You surely lead this site in terms of personal invective per post, by a large margin. Anger management might be in order.

Oh, and you've now committed what to you is the ultimate sin, going off topic. See what happens when you get triggered?

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

"Keep my (user) name out cha mouth"

I Just find it amusing, as I posted, people with no skin in the game are pontificating on their soap box about legalese and ramifications when they are fit to manage a men's room at a bus station. Again, ML likely relied on advice from legal or insurance, any other opinion is just that. Here to wit, an opinion and 5 bucks will get you a cold press in Brooklyn.

I will take it a step further...as Peter stated, from a legal standpoint it is his opinion, with or without advice from insurance carriers, police or lawyers, that letting the auction run with the lots does not rise to the level of fraud. Now how that does not frustrate the Business and Professions code in the state of CA, is beyond me.

Now before we upset King Trent and Bigfoot even further, we really need to start chatting on other threads that they approve of.

[Carter08]

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

"Keep my (user) name out cha mouth"

I Just find it amusing, as I posted, people with no skin in the game are pontificating on their soap box about legalese and ramifications when they are fit to manage a men's room at a bus station. Again, ML likely relied on advice from legal or insurance, any other opinion is just that. Here to wit, an opinion and 5 bucks will get you a cold press in Brooklyn.

This is exactly what you do. You just value your bs opinion more than others. Good for you.

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by Carter08

This is exactly what you do. You just value your bs opinion more than others. Good for you.

Pot..meet kettle!

However,
I only value the facts which memory lane decided to adhere to.

I can appreciate the opinions of experienced people and consignors. I will refute opinions based on fiction and people's feelings. Sorry, I'm not sorry, but all opinions are not equal

[Carter08]

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

Pot..meet kettle!

However,
I only value the facts which memory lane decided to adhere to.

I can appreciate the opinions of experienced people and consignors. I will refute opinions based on fiction and people's feelings. Sorry, I'm not sorry, but all opinions are not equal

Agreed. You have certainly proved to me that some opinions are not so bright and should be discounted. So you have succeeded in a way. Nicely done.

[ClementeFanOh]

Peter Spaeth-

There's so much stupidity in your most recent post- 80 or so on this topic
alone, as I recall- that it's difficult to assign order to a response:

1) I absolutely don't "lead the forum" in invective. The vast majority of my
comments are about cards (crazy, right!) or private messages. You and
the other members of the double digit IQ club might want to explore
PMs...

2) "Anger management is in order". From your lips to God's ears, partner.
I'll get on it right away.

3) My first 2 posts were directly on topic, then you mopes chimed in. Do you
even realize that this thread went "off topic" FIVE HUNDRED messages
ago? Of course you don't, you live in the realm. It's getting past time for
you to understand that your words aren't as clever or valuable as you
believe they are.

4) Your use of the word "triggered" is an automatic signal that you have
been outwitted- again. If I'm "triggered" at 5 posts, what does that make
you? (It's rhetorical, don't try to answer or we will all be treated to 20
additional posts).

TLDR- You 4 are clowns.

Trent King

[Peter_Spaeth]

Add another off-topic, invective-laden post to your tally. It's rich LOL.