![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1. 1952
Let’s all just get that one out of the way. Now, in your opinion, between 1953-1973, what are the next five most difficult high numbers to obtain? Assume this conversation has never happened before and you’re teaching a new collector for the first time. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
COLLECTING BROOKLYN DODGERS & SUPERBAS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alway heard 67s and 66 or maybe just choo choo coleman
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. 66
2. 67 3. 71 4. 61 5. 72 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Id go -
1953 T 1961 T 1966 T 1967 T |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Imho:
1) 66 2) 61 3) 67 4) 72 5) 71 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am picking the same years as others, just changing the order based on my own experience.
1. 66 2. 67 3. 72 4. 61 5. 71 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I look at it in more of a segmented way.
the 1967s are stupidly tough to find at decent prices, but the Seaver, Carew, Sox Team, Shannon, etc., just make it a nightmare. With the 1962s, they are relatively 'easy' to find, but the Rookie Cards turn it into a cardboard hellscape. And, of course, the 1961 run of HOFer All Stars just ruins your life.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1953
1967 1959 1961 1966 1955 Honorable Mention BTW always thought it was cool that the 59s had that Black number so you could easily pick them out of a stack. Pretty unique identifier for Topps Last edited by NiceDocter; 05-10-2024 at 04:34 PM. Reason: . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
66
67 61 71 72 52s are not the most difficult just the most expensive, 66 and 67s regardless of money some you just can’t find. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
67
66 61 72 71
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1967 topps because I did 3 sets lol
1966 topps there was a couple of tuff ones…..544 was one 1961 topps not that bad and now only needing the mantle AS to finish the highs Last edited by Elberson; 05-11-2024 at 02:15 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted: 1970 or 1972 Topps Baseball Semi High and High Numbers | Tere1071 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 06-03-2021 07:12 AM |
1953 Topps HIGH GRADE HIGH NUMBERS!! (2x) Ends 3/31 9:00EST | bobbyw8469 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 10 | 03-31-2020 07:01 PM |
FT: High Grade 1952 Topps High Numbers! | nhsportsguy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 05-20-2016 09:23 AM |
FS 51 Cards 1970 Topps All High Numbers High Grade! | Northviewcats | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-12-2014 01:53 PM |
After the '52 High Nos. What is the Scarcest High No. Series | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 24 | 04-14-2009 04:01 PM |