![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Frank Howard has a Tiger or Cardinal above him.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it shouldn't be: 471 (LE), 472 (LE), or 509 (RE).
So, that leaves 454 (Buchek), 455 (Lolich), 489 (Simmons, with Oliva above him), 495 (McAuliffe), or 514 (Woodeshick). We do have a vertical sequence of Howard above Oliva, and Oliva above Simmons, so Howard and Simmons are in the same column. But that close sequence might make it difficult to have Simmons as the card above Howard. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it my imagination, or does that yellow above Howard appear to extend to the edge of the card?
1966_515_yellow above_1.jpg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think it goes to the edge, but on both these images it certainly extends beyond the Howard image, which is odd enough. If you look at the first Howard image the yellow seems to start further to the left as well, which make is appear the upper card is completely offset to the left by a couple millimeters - that's weird.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 03-16-2024 at 06:42 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 03-16-2024 at 07:52 AM. Reason: Addition |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I went back and looked through some of the 'indeterminate' miscuts we have and was able to place just this one - Terry Fox is beneath the Cubs Rookies on at least one slit - the Cubs rookies is the only non-player card in the 1st column with Fox.
So, baby steps. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having some time to kill, I tried something I thought would be non-productive. We have a Dennis Bennett card showing a slight piece of the card to his left.
I decided to take a run through the 6th series so see if it was possible at all to narrow down the possible cards it could be. Turns out, the vertical and horizontal placement of the trademark line on the orange field cuts the 76 possibilities down to about 6 immediately, and then closer inspection, and comparison with an actual Bennett card for alignment, suggests a single candidate - Al Ferrara. Take a look and let me know if you think there is any other card you think it might be other than Ferrara. Last edited by deweyinthehall; 03-17-2024 at 05:17 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So fox is below Cubs rs and below nuxhall, correct?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |