![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With this, I think we have all 7 LE and RE cards.
LE: Aaron Nuxhall Fox Moeller Skinner Gonzalez Cubs Rookies RE: 6th Checklist 7th Checklist Hamilton Wood Giants Rookies Carreon Edwards Please check my 'math', but I think this is accurate. Granted we still have no idea which ones are on which rows, but still.... Last edited by deweyinthehall; 03-14-2024 at 05:42 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If those are correct then three of each column would be 4x and four of each column would be 3x, Aaron is definitely 4x and the two Checklists are 3x, Gonzalez and Hamilton are probable 4x. That would mean one more left edge (header) card and two more right edge cards would be 4x. ETA: After looking at quantities the other 4x card on the left edge is probably either Nuxhall or Cubs Rookie Stars and the other two right edge 4x card are probably Jake Wood and possibly Giants Rookie Stars.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 03-14-2024 at 06:19 AM. Reason: Addition |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not completely sure how we came up with Wood or Edwards being RE cards. I had the Carreon/Edwards listed a vertical pair, but I can't find the MC where that was firmly established and I have nothing on Wood.
My counts support Aaron & Gonzalez as being 4x, and Nuxhall as being indeterminate, but the other 4 (Cubs, Moeller, Skinner, Fox) as being 3x |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recall seeing a miscut of check 7 (series 6 printing) that has, what looked like a either a team card or Rookie card above it, but the coloring was off (almost looked blue), suggesting a color shift. I don't have that MC though. When I saw that miscut, someone suggested that the card might be a color shifted A's team?? Boy, I wish I had a scan of that MC now.
Lastly (for now), some of these checklists definitely have a red color shift (noticeable because of coloring in the player jersey), which might explain the strange color of the banner above the checklist. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is it certain that Steve Hamilton is under Carreon, couldn’t it be another Dodger/Yankee with blue sky?
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I only have this for Carreon, so it could be Hamilton, Ferrara, Friend, Podres.
Can't be Richardson or Moeller or yanks RS 1966_513__BC_red.jpg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 03-14-2024 at 07:45 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When looking at the Carreon over what I concluded was Hamilton, both the positioning of the visible "S" relative to the letters in "Carreon" as well as the positioning of the orange box on the reverse seems to only be possible with Hamilton, but please take yours and do an in-hand comparison - as much as I want to make progress, I'd prefer to go back to a drawing board than to go down a wrong path.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
https://www.net54baseball.com/showth...=258947&page=6
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In retrospect, that looks like the Giants RS card above the checklist
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Frank Howard has a Tiger or Cardinal above him.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it shouldn't be: 471 (LE), 472 (LE), or 509 (RE).
So, that leaves 454 (Buchek), 455 (Lolich), 489 (Simmons, with Oliva above him), 495 (McAuliffe), or 514 (Woodeshick). We do have a vertical sequence of Howard above Oliva, and Oliva above Simmons, so Howard and Simmons are in the same column. But that close sequence might make it difficult to have Simmons as the card above Howard. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it my imagination, or does that yellow above Howard appear to extend to the edge of the card?
1966_515_yellow above_1.jpg |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think it goes to the edge, but on both these images it certainly extends beyond the Howard image, which is odd enough. If you look at the first Howard image the yellow seems to start further to the left as well, which make is appear the upper card is completely offset to the left by a couple millimeters - that's weird.
Last edited by deweyinthehall; 03-16-2024 at 06:42 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |