1966 Topps 6th Series/Semi-Hi's

[Kevvyg1026]

I think Nuxhall is in Col 1

1966_483_edge.jpg

[Kevvyg1026]

So then I run into issues because, if Nuxhall is a left edge card, then Fox must also be.

1966_483_472_V_fox - nuxhall 1.jpg

[Kevvyg1026]

The issue I have is that I also thought Bob Skinner, 471, was a left edge card. and was above Aaron via these two miscuts, which doesn't allow that card to be Buford.

I had Nuxhall, Fox, Aaron, Moeller, Skinner as lead cards.

I also thought there was a miscut with Buford below Azcue, so if Buford is a left edge card, then Azcue would be as well, (plus Latman), so I have too many left edge cards.

1966_471_blueMark.jpg

1966_471_500.jpg

[deweyinthehall]

Upon further review - I retract my Aaron over Buford declaration, which removes both Buford and Latman from column 1.

What happened, and it's clear if you look at the images I posted above, I was looking at the front of an Aaron card with a Cub or White Sox below, and at the back of an Aaron with a slim piece of a card ABOVE, not below. Complete brain spasm on my part.

So, safely in column 1 now are Aaron, Skinner, Moeller, Nuxhall and Fox.

[deweyinthehall]

Found this Cannizzaro on COMC.

The only cards which could conceivably be below him, IMO, are Linz, Hargan, O'Donoghue and Belinsky.

From the fronts, it seems highly likely to be Belinsky given the coloration of the sky.

From the reverse, O'Donoghue seems to be close as well, but the color seems too off.

The reason I am not comfortable going with Belinsky is that the horizontal stat category lines seem too close to the edge to be completely missing from the back of the miscut Cannizzaro.

In the image with 4 cards layered together, from bottom to top it's Linz, Hargan, O'Donoghue and Belinsky.

Thoughts?

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by deweyinthehall

Found this Cannizzaro on COMC.

The only cards which could conceivably be below him, IMO, are Linz, Hargan, O'Donoghue and Belinsky.

From the fronts, it seems highly likely to be Belinsky given the coloration of the sky.

From the reverse, O'Donoghue seems to be close as well, but the color seems too off.

The reason I am not comfortable going with Belinsky is that the horizontal stat category lines seem too close to the edge to be completely missing from the back of the miscut Cannizzaro.

In the image with 4 cards layered together, from bottom to top it's Linz, Hargan, O'Donoghue and Belinsky.

Thoughts?

It can't be O'Donoghue because of the miscuts of him with either a Twin/Red above him or a Met/Athletic above him (which you determined to be Jimenez). I was able to determine it isn't Indians George Banks or Steve Hargan, so that leaves Belinsky and Linz. I have a miscut of Belinsky with a Brave/Angel above him and a miscut of Linz with a Giant/Senator above him so I am comfortable with saying Belinsky is under Cannizzaro but there is a remote possibility that Linz has a different card above him like O'Donoghue does.

[Kevvyg1026]

Can't be O'Donoghue. Card 501 has a Met/A above him at one place and has a Twin/Red at another place

Linz has a Was/SF above him

The other two, I don't know what card is above. But Belinsky has Wyatt below him

[deweyinthehall]

I'm going to put Belinsky below Cannizzaro - the difference in the color of the sky is, I think, too great to be Linz. I was not aware that Belinsky has a Wyatt beneath him - I'll mark that down as well.

[JollyElm]

This (obviously) isn't scientific or anything (can't get the images to perfectly fit together, mainly due to camera angles), but I did a quick layover of the two cards, and it is quite possible that Bo does fit. The problematic horizontal lines basically end right where the sliver of miscut ends, so it's not definitive either way...


belinskybackcomp.jpg