![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perfect - thanks!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the only 1971 Topps sheet I own and it is from the 3rd series I believe
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty cool how all the action shots are in the first 3 columns.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Going back to one of the reasons I started this particular conversation -
On a "perfect' 132 card slit (264 full sheet), there'd be 12 different rows (each card printed exactly 2 times when you consider both slits). Now, take the series 5 slits here - all rows are 2x except for the Ryan and Otis rows. We wouldn't say the remaining 9 rows were 'short prints' - we'd say the Ryan and Otis cards were 'over printed' or some such (1.3x?) Now with the Series 6 slits - of the 10 different rows, 4 are printed three times and 6 are printed twice. Yet, we refer to these as SPs. Because 2x is the majority on these slits, wouldn't it be better to consider the 3x rows 'over prints' - the effect is the same in that there are less of the so-called "SPs" out there, but I think it would be more accurate. I know this is bucking decades of hobby terminology, but can the majority of cards in a series being considered SPs? Last edited by deweyinthehall; 03-01-2024 at 03:17 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want to discuss years of poor terminology, please remember that every series 1 from 1958 thru 1969 had 110 cards (some years were 1 to 110; others were 1-109 with an extra copy of checklist 1). So, checklist 1 would be printed 4x (albeit most had subtle variations), 44 cards cards in the print run were printed 3x, and 65 cards were printed 2x.
Every series 1 during those years used a similar print pattern (4 rows 3x, 6 rows 2x) and yet SPs are not considered (i.e, labeled) in those years except in rare circumstances (e.g., 1966 Mantle is called a DP). Moreover, as many of us who read this forum have found out, some cards long considered as SPs truly were not. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the 66 Mantle really a double print? I have a 66 sheet and he only appears once on it.
Scott |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Series 1 has 110 cards, so there are 4 rows printed 3x and 6 rows printed 2x. Mantle is on a 3x printed row.
1966_Series_1A.jpg 1966_series_1B.jpg |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Uncut sheets Topps 1971 and 1972 any idea on value? | Shoop | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 09-30-2020 02:58 AM |
Anyone Have Pics of an Uncut 1962 Series 2 Sheet?? | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 03-04-2019 11:10 PM |
Bask Uncut Sheet Trio Sticker 1971-72 Topps | Donscards | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 1 | 07-01-2016 02:36 AM |
Bask Uncut Sheet Trio Sticker 1971-72 Topps | Donscards | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 06-30-2016 12:50 PM |
Anyone Have a Pic of an Uncut 1962 Topps 3rd Series Sheet? | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 01-16-2016 05:12 PM |