Show us a “ only one that’s known of” card

[toppcat]

Originally Posted by hcv123

The discs were clearly issued 2 separate years- that is not in question. So the question is how to differentiate the players that were in both sets and used the same/very similar images. I didn't carefully compare all of them. I did so with the Clemente. There is a cropping difference that makes it easy to differentiate the 1967 disc from the 1968 disc.

Howard, I posted about the differences awhile back on my blog, you're even name-checked! https://www.thetoppsarchives.com/202...nt-eleven.html

[hcv123]

Originally Posted by toppcat

Howard, I posted about the differences awhile back on my blog, you're even name-checked! https://www.thetoppsarchives.com/202...nt-eleven.html

Thanks for sharing it!

[JollyElm]

I'm begging the OP, for the love of God, please edit the title of your thread. That floating space and the bad grammar is breaking my frickin' brain!!

Change:
Show us a “ only one know of” card

To:
Show us an “only one that's known of” card
(Which I'm quite certain also suffers grammatically, but is infinitely better.)

[quitcrab]

English grammar is a weak point for me… my wife is an English teacher. She cringes with my writing !

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by quitcrab

English grammar is a weak point for me… my wife is an English teacher. She cringes with my writing !

Go to your original post, hit the Edit button, and then hit Go Advanced and VOILA!! you can correct the thread title in no time flat.

[Chstrite]

Scott, I had to go look. No Rawlings Staff Advisory box at bottom. I tried to grade but they said no. Might be a BW copy.

[71buc]

This is the only version of this card with these printing anomalies I have ever seen. The team photograph is printed on the non gloss side of the card stock and the back of the card is printed on the glossy side of the card stock. There is also a wet transfer of the back of the card on the front of the card.