Net 54 Hall of Fame??

[bigfish]

Originally Posted by Section103

I already refer to this board to my wife as "the dick swinging board". I can only imagine the implications if a HoF were created.

Hahaha

[JollyElm]

Of course, we'd need to invent some type of newfangled advanced statistic to use as the only measuring stick to gauge whether or not a member belongs in 'The Hall.'

Perhaps KAR ("Knowledge Above Replacement")? Beep beep!!

[jsfriedm]

Oh God. The sports card YouTube influencer-types also talked about creating their own "Hall of Fame." It's like a disease: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8beQvyH0744

[icurnmedic]

No, I feel very distasteful and the metrics used to decide would ultimately be most subjective I feel. It's a great board as it stands with many good contributors and should be left at that, IMHO.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by icurnmedic

No, I feel very distasteful and the metrics used to decide would ultimately be most subjective I feel. It's a great board as it stands with many good contributors and should be left at that, IMHO.

This.

[hcv123]

What I envisioned would by definition be very subjective. It would not be about "metrics", number of posts, size of your collection, value of your collection - none of that would matter.

What Darren wrote is more what I had in mind. How much has a member contributed through this board to the knowledge base in the hobby. Assisted other collectors, etc.

Someone would get selected as the committee/Leon/some other selector process saw fit, could be on an irregular basis as someone was found who merited it.

To me the way Ted unselfishly shared so much information and research defines what I am thinking about qualification.