![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would grade it, couldn't see the scratches until the blow up pic. Presents well!
__________________
Successful B/S/T deals with asoriano, obcbobd, x2dRich2000, eyecollectvintage, RepublicaninMass, Kwikford, Oneofthree67, jfkheat, scottglevy, whitehse, GoldenAge50s, Peter Spaeth, Northviewcats, megalimey, BenitoMcNamara, Edwolf1963, mightyq, sidepocket, darwinbulldog, jasonc, jessejames, sb1, rjackson44, bobbyw8469, quinnsryche, Carter08, philliesfan and ALBB, Buythatcard and JimmyC so far. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jolly - are you a gambling man?
Most of the time, it seems like a gamble when you submit stuff for grading. And this one probably qualifies a bit extra with those flaws. Will the grader go easy on you? Will they freak out and hammer you? Will they even notice in the 15 seconds that they look at this card? Hard to say, really. So you could be looking at an 8. Or you could be looking at a 2. Or somewhere in-between!! And if you don't like what you get, I guess you can always crack and re-submit. Or just crack and stick with raw.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wouldn’t grade it - you never know what a grader is going to do with paper loss , no matter how minimal - somebody might give it a one - imagine a 69 set where Every card look like this ( The print and centering is perfect ) would be a pretty enjoyable set
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yep, don't recommend grading. I would call it paper loss as well.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For 15 bucks anymore, it may be worth a shot. The SGC I am familiar with lately has a decent chance of not even noticing that.
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks, guys!
There are plenty of dark sides to this site, but this thread shows a great aspect of it. Some of the opinions are diametrically opposite of each other, yet each post has been spot on in its own way!! Here's how I've decided to treat it. I rarely, if ever, sell anything, but always must imagine what would happen if I did: Graded - Let's assume that nothing is missed at SGC and it (rightfully?) gets only an SGC 2 due to the scratches/paper loss. If I go to sell it, it will only merit the low sales price that a 2 gets, which practically isn't enough to cover the cost of grading. Plus, if I was hoping to get more for it than that, when I explain it's so much better than a 2 - and it only got that number due to the 'unseen' claw marks - a buyer will think, "No way, man, there's gotta be more to it, hidden bends or creases or something." Ungraded - If someone's interested in buying or trading for it, I simply say it looks really nice over all, but I didn't send it in to be graded because of the minor scratches on the back. The reply? "Cool. Makes sense." Yes, I like to gamble on cardboard, but since I do have another (unclawed) one in similar shape, I'm going to leave this one in the binder and put all of my (slim) hopes on that one instead.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just use a box cutter to trim that part of the card off altogether or a pair of safety scissors and call it OPC
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS High Grade Clemente | hcv123 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-15-2023 05:00 PM |
58 Aaron Beckett grade 5 for a 57 Clemente PSA grade 5 | joepa | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-09-2016 02:33 PM |
WTB 1959 Low Grade Clemente $32 | mintacular | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-09-2013 04:55 PM |
looking for a 56 Clemente white back in higher grade | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-10-2011 03:37 PM |
What's the Grade? 1955 Clemente | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 10-04-2007 10:14 PM |