![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These two beauties were in a lot I bought recently.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good ones
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do I do a post in the main thread? To start a new thread?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not clear what you are asking. If you want to start a new thread in this post war section there is new thread icon on upper left of main page. Same for main page for all sections
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of 1978 bleeding blue hockey cards.
1978 Hockey Bleeds .jpg |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
By the way, McSorley stated in the NHL in 1983 so you are correct. Mike |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You guys have some eagle eyes.
I sold this one and wish I hadn't: ![]() The famous blue flame fart card. Shameless plug: I am setting up at the Ontario CA show this weekend with an entire section of printing freaks and flaws for sale. Some real doozies too.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That Davis is awesome.
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Notice the black line across his left hand. I was told by the eBay seller that this is the common and the one I had with NO line is tougher.
Last edited by Sliphorn; 12-27-2023 at 01:07 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The no line is definitely easier. Also, I’ve never come across a Katt without that black blob in the lower left of the name box.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Checked and one in my set has no line…yeah
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 12-20-2023 at 03:28 PM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Actually there are many out there without the black dot, but so far all without also have a small yellow vertical line at the left, likely due to a slight print shift. Last edited by Sliphorn; 12-27-2023 at 01:10 PM. Reason: Added new card |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() 1970 Topps - [Base] #706 - High # - John McNamara Courtesy of COMC.com ![]() 1970 Topps - [Base] #706 - High # - John McNamara Courtesy of COMC.com Print dot/hickey above the R in McNamara on the back. Without defect is much less common that with the print defect. Must have been something on the original printing plate.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 07:58 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |