![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Someone answers the phone at SGc? Must be new technology
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am bumping this thread to mention that I attempted to bring a stack of SGC labels to the SGC booth at the National last week, and I was told that they do not update their pop reports.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What baffles me is when you send a card in for re-holder they give you a whole new slab/serial number....idk
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why would they? That's just creating work with zero benefit, unless it's a card with a pop count of 10 or something.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. Last edited by Snowman; 07-31-2024 at 02:53 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll chime in that the reason that less people use SGC pop report is it's a pain in the ass to use - to find the set then scroll through multilple pages to find the card. PSA's takes a bit to load, but at least it's all on one page once it does.
Semi-off topic - I just sent my first submission to SGC for grading - Is there zero rhyme or reason to SGC's numbering? PSA appears to be sequential, but my submitted together cards cert #'s were all over the place. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
There is an enormous benefit for cards with low populations in the single digits. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It takes a lot.of work to maintain Intergrity of the pop report. Nobody cares about SgC pops or set registry, even the workers. 30 seconds to delete a flip.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I sent three cards in for grading two weeks ago and all three showed up on the SGC pop report after grading. I think you got wrong info.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 08-01-2024 at 07:39 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That is VERY disappointing if true.
__________________
_ Successful transactions with: Natswin2019, ParachromBleu, Cmount76, theuclakid, tiger8mush, shammus, jcmtiger, oldjudge, coolshemp, joejo20, Blunder19, ibechillin33, t206kid, helfrich91, Dashcol, philliesfan, alaskapaul3, Natedog, Kris19, frankbmd, tonyo, Baseball Rarities, Thromdog, T2069bk, t206fix, jakebeckleyoldeagleeye, Casey2296, rdeversole, brianp-beme, seablaster, twalk, qed2190, Gorditadogg, LuckyLarry, tlhss, Cory |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It is both true and disappointing. Edited to clarify that new cards may or may not be added to the population, but the gentleman at the SGC booth assured me that they do not accept cracked out flips for removal. Last edited by 4815162342; 07-31-2024 at 03:03 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had hoped for improvement in this area after the Collectors buyout. I hoped wrong.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CSG pop report | Frank A | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-10-2022 07:55 AM |
PSA Pop Report | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-16-2021 07:50 PM |
PSA Pop Report | Lgarza99 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-13-2014 05:18 AM |
Please report | Bestdj777 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 08-06-2013 02:55 PM |
need a pop report in psa | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-05-2007 07:35 AM |