![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great examples! Thanks for sharing.
Pretty crazy how harsh PSA has gotten on vintage. The one thing I would say is that SGC can sometimes be harsh re: centering. So if you have a centered vintage card, your best would be to go with SGC. But if your card is not centered, it is more of a crapshoot between PSA and SGC. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It works both ways. I recently had an entire sub severely undergraded by SGC. I regraded the three cards I cared most about with PSA. +2, +2, and +.5.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 12-08-2023 at 07:24 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Great examples snowman. Using the same card is WAY more realistic that 2 completely different cards of the same grade. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is an extremely rare circumstance in my experience. Unless your cards were heavily OC.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They were not, not at all. I guess I got unlucky with the grader. Two grades low, consistently. Worse in some cases.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 12-08-2023 at 08:53 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Outstanding post and pics. Really drives the point home.
I have used SGC exclusively since their days in Parsippany. I have always been satisfied by the grade received and cannot understand why people keep giving their money to PSA, only to be disappointed on some level. Last edited by Vintagedeputy; 12-08-2023 at 08:28 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Its a fool's folly to think that two subjective, arbitrary, constantly-evolving grading scales developed by independent, competing companies would line up when grading cards. There should be no expectation that a PSA 6 should line up with an SGC 6, condition wise and/or price wise.
Add to that, the subjectivity of the individual graders and even the non-repeatability of a given grader over time, it's no wonder that the data is all over the place. It does seem like SGC gives a bit more weight to 'eye appeal' than does PSA, sometimes giving a bump for better centered cards. To me, that is preferable.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-66) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This is also happening on vintage auto grading and has been for a few years. What was once a 10 is now an 8, etc. PSA 9 is about as good as you'll ever get on a grade now. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WIFE SAYS SELL OFF EXTRAS..PRICES REDUCED.80+ SLABS! Cross posted | insrman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 11-15-2022 08:55 AM |
WIFE SAYS SELL OFF EXTRAS..PRICES REDUCED.80+ SLABS! Cross posted | insrman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-15-2022 08:55 AM |
Massive sell-off of acquired PSA SLABS ['61-'78]!!! | insrman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 05-19-2021 07:29 AM |
Mouse over image to zoom Have one to sell? Sell it yourself 1895 N300 Mayo Cut Plug | mcap100176 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 02-09-2013 04:02 AM |
Updated with BL & Pied 42 list.......Sell sell sell sell some more | Pup6913 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 7 | 05-01-2012 06:42 AM |