Show Some OJ Subsets

[alywa]

Keefe Run 2.jpg

Plus a 1890 Players League Version

N172 Keefe 251-1 Players League.jpg


Plus Tim and his evil Doppelgänger Jim from 1888
Tim and Jim Keefe.jpg

[alywa]

John Ward 1-9.jpg

[alywa]

Galvin Quartet.jpg

[alywa]

Brouthers Big Small Duo.jpg

[alywa]

And the ultimate "will never be finished" run... 2/9 Deacon Whites

Deacon White Duo.jpg

[alywa]

Sort of cheating here as they aren't all OJ, but they are OJ Adjacent and pretty

Brouthers Collection.jpg

[alywa]

1894 Phillies OF.jpg

[BobbyStrawberry]

nevermind

[spiegz11]

Originally Posted by alywa

Attachment 600018

Amazing Pud Galvin subset! I have seen the Galvin hands at waist variation with the Old Judge Cigarettes wording to the right of his face and others with the same photo that have the wording to the left of his face. Does anyone have thoughts on whether the location of the Old Judge Cigarettes wording on cards with the same picture are considered separate variations?

Steve

[oldjudge]

Originally Posted by spiegz11

Amazing Pud Galvin subset! I have seen the Galvin hands at waist variation with the Old Judge Cigarettes wording to the right of his face and others with the same photo that have the wording to the left of his face. Does anyone have thoughts on whether the location of the Old Judge Cigarettes wording on cards with the same picture are considered separate variations?

Steve

Any difference between cards is a variation. In my mind a variation like this is more significant than a team spelling variation (Omaha vs Omahas) but less significant than an actual team change (Detroit to Boston) and certainly less significant than a pose change. If I was doing a player run in the set I would try to get all variations, no matter how minor.

[alywa]

Originally Posted by spiegz11

Amazing Pud Galvin subset! I have seen the Galvin hands at waist variation with the Old Judge Cigarettes wording to the right of his face and others with the same photo that have the wording to the left of his face. Does anyone have thoughts on whether the location of the Old Judge Cigarettes wording on cards with the same picture are considered separate variations?

Steve

Cool. They are both 1887, I don't have Jay's book in front of me right now, but if I remember correctly yours is an 0 number type B (script), mine is an 0 number type A. I don't know of the logo placement difference is due to the subtype or different runs of the same type (in other words is there a Type A with the other logo placement or not)