Auction Reserves - let’s discuss

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards

I actually would have to disagree with this sentiment.

First, if a consignor wins their own item it technically IS a sale. Of course since they are getting a portion of the sale they don't owe all that much on a percentage basis.

Second they are only one bid over what another bidder was willing to pay as opposed to the reserve method, especially as some auctions use it where they have the right to place an artificial bid up to the amount just below the reserve.

So if you have an item which has a reserve of $10,000 and it stalls at $4,000 and the auction company bids $9999 (or whatever the increment would be) and then one more bid is placed how is a sale $6000 more than the 2nd bidder was willing to go more valid than a sale to the consignor where it went one bid over what the 2nd bidder was willing to go?

To be clear, just in case, We don't allow consignors to bid on their own items, nor do we do reserves, so I'm not defending either practice for my own benefit. I don't believe either option is the best way for us.

It is not a sale. The item didn't change hands. If I make a hot dog, take out my wallet and hand myself a $100 bill, I didn't buy a hot dog for $100.

[Snapolit1]

Originally Posted by G1911

It is not a sale. The item didn't change hands. If I make a hot dog, take out my wallet and hand myself a $100 bill, I didn't buy a hot dog for $100.

In a recent auction I saw an item I sold last month to someone on BST. As soon as I saw it for sale I had sellers’ remorse. And it was selling for less than I sold it for. I wanted to bid on it and get it back. Didn’t but wish I had.

Didn’t do it but don’t see any ethical problem in buying it back.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

In a recent auction I saw an item I sold last month to someone on BST. As soon as I saw it for sale I had sellers’ remorse. And it was selling for less than I sold it for. I wanted to bid on it and get it back. Didn’t but wish I had.

Didn’t do it but don’t see any ethical problem in buying it back.

You had already sold the item so you wouldn't have been bidding on something you currently owned and were selling. That's a big difference than what others are talking about regarding bidding on your own consignment.

[Snapolit1]

Originally Posted by jayshum

You had already sold the item so you wouldn't have been bidding on something you currently owned and were selling. That's a big difference than what others are talking about regarding bidding on your own consignment.

Poorly explained . . .I wasn't saying it was the same situation . .. or didn't intend to. Just was a weird spot and I felt odd bidding to but back something I had just sold someone (for more).

[nat]

I'm a small fish in auction-world, but for my part I'm annoyed by reserves. Usually I'll just skip an auction if there's a reserve on it. Plenty of other, non-annoying, things to go after.

Frankly, I prefer a high opening bid. Then at least I know what I'm in for if I decide to play, rather than not knowing if I'm wasting my time.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by nat

I'm a small fish in auction-world, but for my part I'm annoyed by reserves. Usually I'll just skip an auction if there's a reserve on it. Plenty of other, non-annoying, things to go after.

Frankly, I prefer a high opening bid. Then at least I know what I'm in for if I decide to play, rather than not knowing if I'm wasting my time.

High opening bids don't mix well with auctions requiring you have a bid in in order to bid in extended time.

[oldjudge]

To me this discussion is ridiculous. The only thing that matters is the all in cost on the card. The path you take to get to that number is meaningless.

[GeoPoto]

"High opening bids don't mix well with auctions requiring you have a bid in in order to bid in extended time."

I don't follow this -- isn't the only reason to be eligible for extended bidding so you can top opposing bids in overtime? Why would any bidder who wanted to bid in overtime be scared off by having to top the existing pre-overtime high bid?

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Snapolit1

In a recent auction I saw an item I sold last month to someone on BST. As soon as I saw it for sale I had sellers’ remorse. And it was selling for less than I sold it for. I wanted to bid on it and get it back. Didn’t but wish I had.

Didn’t do it but don’t see any ethical problem in buying it back.

Huh? When did I say or imply it was not okay to legitimately buy back a card you had previously owned? What does this have to do with fake sales where a card never changed hands and was not factually sold at all?

If Person A sells a card and person A is the winning bidder, or a proxy agent of person A is the winning bidder to hand the card back to them as part of a pre-planned operation, there was factually not a sale. You can't buy something from yourself... The most common sense of basic facts this hobby wants to disagree with is just wild sometimes lol.