T206 question

[Leon]

I don't have much to add but that is great info Pat (even if it's only your opinion)

[parkerj33]

Hey Pat, great insights...remind me again where to find the research (or proof?) that the sheets were at least 12 high and have the EXACT same subject in all 12 spots? also that if a verticle is split, it is split exactly in half. I hadn't caught those two subtleties before.

Also, regarding the super prints, are you saying they were printed on their very own sheets, or they were mixed in on same sheet as print group 3/4/5?

thx jim

[Pat R]

Originally Posted by parkerj33

Hey Pat, great insights...remind me again where to find the research (or proof?) that the sheets were at least 12 high and have the EXACT same subject in all 12 spots? also that if a verticle is split, it is split exactly in half. I hadn't caught those two subtleties before.

Also, regarding the super prints, are you saying they were printed on their very own sheets, or they were mixed in on same sheet as print group 3/4/5?

thx jim

Hey Jim, There are two plate scratch sheets that put the minimum height at 12 cards high of the same subject in each vertical column.

Here's the best example. I've put red lines over the actual scratches and a black box around the Simon Nicholls vertical row because he has scratches on cards that cover the longest span.

Sheetper20G%20-%20Copy - Copy (2).jpg

Here are two examples of the Oldring scratch in the lower right corner of this sheet that have huge corner crop marks that indicate the right corner (back) and left corner (front) of this sheet.

img916.jpg
img917.jpg

I don't have positive proof that on the sheets that were split were split 50/50 it's just my opinion from the research that I've done.

Of all the two name cards that are confirmed none are from print group 3 or 4 and the two super prints that are confirmed (Chance yellow portrait and Chase blue portrait) have a print group 2 subject on the top.