![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scanners often remove dots from cards. Can't say whether this was intentional or not. Since it was not advertised as missing the dot it looks like you made a miscalculation and will just have to keep the card as is or eat whatever loss you may have upon reselling it if it sells for lower than what you paid. As Leon tells us Caveat Emptor.
__________________
Tony Collecting: 1909-1911 T206 Southern Leaguers 1914 Cracker Jack Set (94 out of 145) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I clearly bought a card that is missing the dot after the "Y" Not seeing any miscalculation there at all....... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
He didn't make a miscalculation. He bought something that was significantly not as advertised (SNAD). Sort of the opposite of what you said, but carry on.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
WOW! Less than 15 minutes my Neutral Feedback was removed so that seller is on top of this situation and at this point, I don't think he is being very honest. NOT COOL by him. ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is what Dan posted:
"Now he didn't advertise it as missing the Dot so I am guessing he didn't doctor the scan but how else could this have happened? You can clearly see the Dot after the N." It was clearly a miscalculation since there was no dot...If there was any doubt then a question to the seller about whether dot or no dot was present and asking for additional scans before purchase would have made more sense. I agree that if the seller was on the up and up he would have accepted a return since the item was not what you thought it was.
__________________
Tony Collecting: 1909-1911 T206 Southern Leaguers 1914 Cracker Jack Set (94 out of 145) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Once again, to make clear, I am not saying the seller did anything or not. I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise. This isn't about why, or how, it happened. It is only not as advertised, accidentally or not.
A simple return from the seller would be appropriate, imo (but my opinion doesn't count). Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 11-05-2023 at 06:27 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Brian (I personally think a little dot stealing T206 gremlin mischieviously snatched it from the scan. No matter what the case, sorry Dan) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 - wow what have I been missing! | mferronibc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 12-30-2019 08:28 PM |
T206 (Missing Color) | Craig M | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 56 | 01-23-2016 07:00 PM |
WTB/WTTF: T206 Magee (port) and T206 Doyle hands above head | AndrewJerome | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-08-2012 09:49 PM |
SURVEY: T206 Joe Doyle N.Y (missing partial Y & period) - - - 4th variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-20-2011 02:15 PM |
ok, what am I missing here T206 Magie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 09-28-2005 11:26 AM |