![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is certainly more variability in eye appeal in the mid-range and lower. PSA 2 through about 6 are good examples. My favorite place to play right now is a card that looks like a 6 or so with nice corners, but only got a 3 or 4 because of a wrinkle or hairline crease or some other surface issue that's difficult to see. I recently got a '66 Jim Palmer RC in a 4. Card looks like a 6 - the grade is due to a wax stain that you can't even really tell is there.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-02-2023 at 08:45 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don’t mind lower to mid grade cards at all.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hope it’s okay for me to bump this thread. I just got back into the hobby a couple of months ago after being away for over 3 decades. I’m basically starting all over again. I sold off almost all of my collection over 30 years ago, except for a few of my favorite cards. It has been quite a learning experience getting up to speed with where the hobby is now. Things sure have changed since I was in the hobby back in the late 1980s.
This thread about mid-grade collecting is definitely one of the best things that I have found in my hobby re-education so far. I started out again in collecting by looking at higher grade cards and I quickly found it to be kind of stressful. I wanted to make sure that I was fine with any flaws that I could find in a card graded at something like a PSA 8 before I potentially spent money on the card. That was no fun at all. After reading this thread and few others similar to it, I decided to settle into mid-grade cards in the 3-6 range, with an occasional 7, for cards from the 50s through 70s. It’s been more fun since then. A nicely centered card with nice color and registration in that grade range is a nice looking card and a heck of lot easier on the wallet and stress level. I can also get what seems to be infinitely more cards that way versus focusing on high graded cards. Anyway, hello to you all from Ohio. Michael |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey, welcome aboard!!!
So many of us who used to seek out prime examples of cards had to develop a whole different game plan when the pandemic saw the prices on everything shoot into the stratosphere. That was a sea change of a "WTF??!!!" moment, and caused collectors to start making much 'better' purchase decisions with their budgets. Good luck with your collecting rebirth, you'll definitely have fun here on Net54!!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Elm! This is easily the best forum I’ve found for baseball card collecting.
(Spelling edit. Mea culpa, Elm) Last edited by MBH65; 05-29-2024 at 03:56 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Always! Welcome aboard!
Apparently I started this thread 6 years and 2 days ago, lol. Mid and lower grade vintage is the lifeblood of many in this hobby, I remain convinced. Many of us here are far more interested in baseball and baseball history as far as our collections are concerned, over and above our cards being "investment pieces" which might some day help us retire. It was with that notion that I asked that question 6 years ago... This isn't even midgrade, but here is today's pickup. I'm so proud of this damn thing this is the 3rd thread I think I've posted it in, LOL. Good to hear from you, Michael! ![]()
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 05-24-2024 at 06:45 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Some mid grades.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, John.
It’s been a lot of fun getting back into collecting again with the opportunity to revisit all the baseball history and memories. Every card really has its own story to tell and collecting more cards by targeting middle grade cards means more history to relive and enjoy for me all over again. Those are some real beauties you posted there! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Michael. I feel like the mid-grades represent the best value in card collecting..
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying collectors grade (F-G) of these 4 1959 Topps | Ed_Hutchinson | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-06-2017 02:50 PM |
FS: Several Collectors Grade 1950s Mantles | j_bodensteiner | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-09-2016 01:55 PM |
Plank, Collins and Evers - Collectors Grade *reduced | Tao_Moko | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-08-2015 09:01 PM |
1971 T goldmine for off-grade collectors ~ 60% of the set! | JElwell | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-07-2014 08:43 AM |
Collectors Forensic Register = Grade Tech Services Inc.? | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 11-13-2010 10:10 AM |