![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Razor sharp edges! Fresh from the razor!
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do the cards get high prices because of the sticker, or do the cards get high prices because they genuinely look nice? PWCC stickers may draw extra attention to the card, but I tend to think these cards sell on their own merits, not because of the sticker attached to the slab.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So, it would make sense that well-centered cards with a PWCC sticker will sell for more. In my opinion, this is because they're well-centered cards. ### Related opinions - an unbelievably high percentage of those same collectors aren't really looking at many card attributes other than centering. It's almost as if nothing else matters to the masses. Imagine a random VG 3 vintage HOFer with print spots, surface wrinkles, and a thumbnail gouge along one edge. If it's centered reasonably well, people will say it looks "strong for the grade" and charge a significant premium for it. It makes me wonder...why get cards graded in the first place if all anyone seems to care about is the centering component of eye appeal? (yes, I realize the answer is money)
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
There are many components of eye appeal. The only one people seem to care about, though, is centering.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think centering of a card with a crease across the face would be considered eye appeal. It's a combination of several factors of which centering is a big part.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
“How’s the eye appeal?” “Not so good.” Otherwise, we’re both probably saying similar things. Happy collecting.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I tried briefly to get on the centering train probably about a decade ago. It's not for me. I would much rather have a slightly OC card that has nice color and image focus, and decent corners than I would have a card that tolerates other flaws all in the name of centering almighty. Some of the YouTube channels I subscribe to, and I see people lauding perfect centering on cards with noticeable print flaws, or that might be slightly faded. This has never made sense to me. I don't like miscut cards or 90/10 OC in most cases, but to me most everything else looks at least decent, and moreover how I remember cards coming out of the pack in the late 1980's and earlier. As we go forward especially in a hobby where it's becoming painfully evident that slabgate didn't make a difference - to me less than perfect centering is going to start to become evidence of authenticity / unaltered cards for those of us who still care. Cards 50+ years ago by and large even coming out of the pack did not conform to the standards some want to force them into today, to get into these ridiculously high grade slabs.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-02-2023 at 06:17 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
*ENDED* 1955 Clemente Rookie, PWCC "Superior (Top5 %)" Eye Appeal Certification | GoBigRed | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-31-2021 05:56 AM |
*SOLD* FS 1955 Koufax Rookie, PWCC "Above Average" Eye Appeal | GoBigRed | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-30-2021 09:29 AM |
CSA rating of 8 vs PSA rating of 8 Help?! | jeffmcurrie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-15-2014 03:49 PM |
T205 SGC Power Rating | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-27-2009 04:55 AM |
Rating the Auction Sites | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-15-2003 11:03 AM |