![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just noticed from the last couple submissions and talking to dealers that SGC is really cracking down on centering. Anyone have an opinion as to why?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As someone with centering OCD I can only guess that better centered cards are more visually appealing and go for a premium, maybe they are now taking that into account.
Last edited by Casey2296; 09-14-2023 at 10:57 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Hard to imagine they could get any tougher with their grading. I really feel like there is this unspoken competition between PSA and SGC as to who can grade the strictest. Can you post some examples? Just curious what is coming out there at this moment.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes! They used to grade the card and let the buyer decide on eye appeal! About.2 years ago I sent them a 9oc and asked for an sgc 6. I got a call saying "we aren't even going to charge you, because it's barely a 2". I found that pretty odd
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors Last edited by Republicaninmass; 09-15-2023 at 07:03 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sean, I agree with others you have spoken to regarding SGC and centering. Below is an example of two similar cards with very different grades. The first graded only on merits of the card condition with no hit for centering (I don't own). The second (I do own) I was graded a 3 due to centering, the card is otherwise in EX-NM like condition. I was shocked at the severity of the hit.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It has a lot of implications, one of which we already see in the record prices achieved for cards graded 1-3, which often look better than old 4-6 grades. People are buying the card more than ever except for registry people and really high end scarcities in grading. It makes grades more irrelevant other than being able to get graded instead of not-graded or Authentic. Even authentic’s trade well if they look nice. So…instead of increasing their relevance, the TPGs are decreasing it for most cards. I used to not look at 2’s and 3’s for cards i wanted to collect,now i welcome them because they might go cheaper and they often look great.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For example, i bought most (39) of the non-premium N162s in this set in these grades. The cards are stunning! Most have a little print imperfections on the backs that are barely noticeable. If they had been given 4-7 grades (what i consider them) they would have been untouchable at the prices I paid. So it can be great when buying. (Either that or no one else cares about these, which is what i would find out if I went to sell them again! ;-)
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Tougher PCs & Blotter | Marckus99 | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-11-2023 03:48 PM |
FS: 4 Tougher OJs | Webster | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 3 | 07-14-2022 04:18 PM |
Tougher E90-1's ALL SOLD! | 3-2-count | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 07-25-2009 10:35 PM |
FS: T206 Cubs A Couple of Tougher Cards With Tougher Backs | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 02-10-2008 09:57 AM |
some of my tougher wants..................... | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 04-29-2007 10:28 PM |