I Believe This Could Be A Complete Horizontal Layout For This T206 Sheet

[Pat R]

Clarke and Ganley

Sheet [A-B] X Large updated - Copy (4).jpg

img771.jpg

img772.jpg

[Pat R]

Bresnahan and Gibson

Sheet [A-B] X Large updated - Copy (4).jpg

I thought that I had the Bresnahan scratch but after searching for it I discovered that I don't have one so I'm substituting an image that I have of it.

Of the 34 scratches on the primary scratch from this sheet I have at least one copy for 31 0f the 34 scratches. I'm lacking Bresnahan and Johnson and I've yet to find a match for the O'Leary scratch.

Bresnahan Plate Scratch - Copy.jpg
img775.jpg

[edhans]

Truly remarkable work, Pat. Curious about the Liebhardt a few posts up. The massive top border would seem to suggest that it was at the top of the sheet. Why is there no evidence of the bottom caption from the card above it?

[Pat R]

Originally Posted by edhans

Truly remarkable work, Pat. Curious about the Liebhardt a few posts up. The massive top border would seem to suggest that it was at the top of the sheet. Why is there no evidence of the bottom caption from the card above it?

Thank you Ed and good observation. I was actually going to post about that when I got into the three other scratches on this sheet besides the primary scratch.

I think that I'm probably confusing some people with the template I've been posting of this plate scratch sheet. There are a few other separate plate scratch sheets besides this one. When I started working on these I made templates by printing out the Piedmont backs on 8 1/2 x 11 paper and taping 4 of them together so they were 34 inches wide and some of them were over 40 inches high. After I already started this sheet I discovered some of the secondary scratches on this sheet I just drew them in above the primary scratch which was already on the bottom of the template (because of the direction of the scratch) rather than going through the trouble of making a new template. So the other scratches would have actually been somewhere on this sheet below the primary scratch instead of above it as it is on this template.


Besides the Liebhardt I have other scratches that show that the primary scratch from Shaw to O'Leary was at the top of the sheet and everything from the left of Shaw was in the second row down on the sheet.

Sheet [A-B] X Large updated - Copy (4).jpg

Shaw and O'leary scratches with big top borders without part of the caption at the top

img780.jpg
img781.jpg


These are all to the left of Shaw and the names at the top would have been from the top row on the sheet

img704.jpg
img705 - Copy (2).jpg
img782.jpg

[edhans]

Thank you for the explanation, Pat.

[Pat R]

Johnson and Stovall

Sheet [A-B] X Large updated - Copy (5).jpg

Johnson 1.jpg

Stovall.jpg

[Pat R]

O'leary

Sheet [A-B] X Large updated - Copy (4).jpg

O'Leary _1_.jpg

[Pat R]

I just recently found a new scratch from one of the secondary scratches that closes up a gap in the confirmed scratches for 5 subjects on this particular scratch (same 5 subjects in order as the primary scratch)

Sheet [A-B] X Large updated - Copy (4).jpg

img801.jpg

You can see why the secondary scratches are far more difficult to find than the primary scratches.

[IMG][/IMG]