![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hold on...
Sequential numbers would suggest the cards were submitted together. And that suggests that they were part of someone's collection. If the cards were from what's considered a defined set, and the numbers went straight through from the beginning of the set to the end, then it seems that would have a bit of cool factor associated with it. To get that done, a submitter would want to be sure that each of the cards would grade, and that the idiot graders would grade and generate the certificate numbers in order... let them know what you're trying to accomplish. 1948 Bowman would be a small enough 'set' to do get them graded sequentially, ditto for W511... T206 would be a Monster... 1911 ZeeNuts a Bear to get done. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And I saw what you did there Frank... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Obviously, Master Collectors of M113s and M114s have immunity when it comes to Jedi Mind Tricks.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not a huge set but I had a 59 Fleer Ted Williams set all graded at the same time about 5-7 years ago. When I sold it I broke it up as nobody cared that the serial numbers were sequential.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Pretty much agree that it would be overlooked and likely annoying to see it used as a sales method.
It also would be more than likely ignored as inconsequential by the graders and I could see a couple getting out of order in the process. That would be one tremendously expensive trial run to sub an entire set. In addition the chance of every single card coming back with the grade wanted and zero rejections for minimum size or any other reason in a reasonably large set would be fairly low odds. The one rejection or wanting to upgrade any card and the whole plan is kaput.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think we're all ignoring a certain collecting niche that would go absolutely bonkers and pay a huuuuuuuge premium for a graded set that is sequentially numbered...the OCD fellahs!!!!
![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Four Serial Numbered Cards | xplainer | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 1 | 06-03-2022 01:36 PM |
Top high numbered cards? | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 12-01-2018 08:46 AM |
What is text on W-519 Numbered-1 | MMarvelli | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-23-2015 07:12 AM |
WTB: 90's, 00's numbered inserts | panamamyers | Football Cards Forum | 0 | 04-22-2013 06:52 PM |
W 517 mini's - Are they numbered? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-05-2007 02:58 PM |