1951 Parkhurst Hockey Opinion

[skelly423]

I wish I could articulate why, but those cards don't quite look right to me. There's nothing glaringly obvious I can point to, but something about them is off IMO. Hopefully you'll get a better answer from someone else.

[Leon]

After comparing those to quite a few on ebay, the ones in the first post look a bit washed out?
Here are some from ebay...they appeaer brighter and better focused? I am on the fence. Maybe a Parkie expert will chime in?
.

[LuckyLarry]

[LuckyLuke]

Thank you for all the valued input, it is very much appreciated.

I will post clearer photos when i have the cards in my possession.

[Leon]

For what it's worth, the backs make me think they are entirely real. Good luck!
.

[BillyCoxDodgers3B]

Originally Posted by Leon

For what it's worth, the backs make me think they are entirely real. Good luck!
.

I take it you're referring to the ones Larry posted as opposed to the OP's. Agree with you there, of course.

Note the absolute perfect centering on all the cards in the first post and comedically sharp cuts.

I'm not claiming to be a Parkie expert, but with these, does anyone have to be?!

[Leon]

Originally Posted by BillyCoxDodgers3B

I take it you're referring to the ones Larry posted as opposed to the OP's. Agree with you there, of course.

Note the absolute perfect centering on all the cards in the first post and comedically sharp cuts.

I'm not claiming to be a Parkie expert, but with these, does anyone have to be?!

Yes, I had skipped a post and was referring to the one's Larry posted. Getting old sucks . The top ones still look dubious, to me.
.