![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
CSG grades a lot because people love the $12 per card grading. $12 vs $18 is a huge gap. 50% more. Try to sell that CSG card though. You will get your feelings hurt real quick.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Two hobby terms across all sports/gaming and era are registry and pop. Psa owns both. They will continue being number one into the foreseeable future. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I believe the numbers for May were PSA over a million cards graded SGC 88K graded cards CSG 66K graded cards
__________________
Looking for 1930 baguer chocolates Al Lopez 1880-1930s Detroit Tigers 1907 Wolverine News Postcards 1907 Dietsche Detroit Tigers Postcards 1907-1909 H.M. Taylor Detroit Tigers Postcards 1908 Brush Detroit Postcards 1908 Detroit Free Press Postcards 1909 Topping & Co Postcards 1935 M120 Detroit Free Press. Complete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok cool
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had never seen the volume data from gemrate.com before so I did a little digging. About half that PSA volume is Pokémon and other TCG cards. If you break down May 2023, PSA graded 465k sports cards, 4.3% were pre 1950, so they graded about 20k “vintage” sports cards. SGC graded 71k sports cards of which 13.5% were pre-1950, so they graded just under 10k “vintage” sports cards. This is probably a better indication of SGC’s share in its core market. Their share undoubtedly declines in the post-war era due to PSA’s registry. Beckett and CSG aren’t really viable competitors in the vintage market.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Funny, I was jokingly going to ask how much of last month's zillion PSA-slabbed cards were of the Pokemanian persuasion.
Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 06-07-2023 at 10:59 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can get a place to grade cards for even less, people seem to be betting that the $12 at CSG will generate more profit to them than $18 will at SGC. It seems to be the measurable case that CSG is moving up and SGC is not. Submissions seems to be a reasonable criteria to see who, at the moment, the market is leaning too. I’m not sure I see the case that SGC is going up, or stealing market share from PSA as you claimed. It appears to actually be CSG doing that, in measurable fact. Not that either is a short term threat to PSA’s dominance, their market share advantage is gigantic.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder how many of CSG's submissions are at $12 a pop. I suspect that with some of their allies (i.e. PWCC, maybe some others), preferential pricing could be a lot lower in exchange for the volume and repeat business.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel Last edited by raulus; 06-06-2023 at 03:30 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the CSG brand so far..... I hope they keep doing well.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|