Starting to lose faith in PSA with this kind of stuff....

[whiteymet]

I'll see your Wally Moon and raise you a Jackie Robinson

Take a look at this "Canadian" RED tint Exhibit card of Jackie Robinson!

Neither a RED tint or a Canadian Exhibit which have the card number in a diamond.

This is a normal 47-66 Exhibit card

https://www.ebay.com/itm/38553692625...Bk9SR9TQs47uYQ

[Bcwcardz]

Originally Posted by whiteymet

I'll see your Wally Moon and raise you a Jackie Robinson

Take a look at this "Canadian" RED tint Exhibit card of Jackie Robinson!

Neither a RED tint or a Canadian Exhibit which have the card number in a diamond.

This is a normal 47-66 Exhibit card

https://www.ebay.com/itm/38553692625...Bk9SR9TQs47uYQ

I’m convinced they put whatever the submitter has on the form. They don’t verify or do any research. If you think it is such card they will slab it as such. So so many non Topps Tiffany cards with Tiffany designation on the slab. It’s not just a one off. It’s pretty obvious on those and a pretty egregious error. I really don’t know what kind of system they got going over there. I wish someone would break their Area 51 like silence and let us know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BobbyStrawberry]

Originally Posted by Bcwcardz

I really don’t know what kind of system they got going over there. I wish someone would break their Area 51 like silence and let us know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1

[brianp-beme]

Originally Posted by Bcwcardz

I’m convinced they put whatever the submitter has on the form. They don’t verify or do any research. If you think it is such card they will slab it as such.

I believe this might be a case of the submitter sending the card to PSA upside down in the Card Saver sleeve.

Brian