PSA reholder issues - warning to submitters

[G1911]

Originally Posted by parkplace33

I know there are some on this board that are doubting this, but I know for a fact this has happened, especially recently. I never said all, just that there are examples and that it can happen.

If you know it for a fact it should be very easy to post the evidence.

You could find a handful of people on Twitter who post that Bigfoot kidnapped their grandma. That doesn't mean anything. I have little but contempt for PSA and their incompetency, but there should be some reasonable basis here for a charge levied. I am unable to find one.

[trambo]

Originally Posted by G1911

If you know it for a fact it should be very easy to post the evidence.

You could find a handful of people on Twitter who post that Bigfoot kidnapped their grandma. That doesn't mean anything. I have little but contempt for PSA and their incompetency, but there should be some reasonable basis here for a charge levied. I am unable to find one.

+1 here. As I said a few months ago, the only examples I have seen are where there were case issues or obvious issues (like a card submerged in water while in a slab). As has been asked numerous times, show the examples. Not hard to prove it exists if it in fact does exist.

[Johnny630]

I wonder if cards sent in for reholdered service count towards their stats of total cards graded per month?

[Jay Wolt]

Originally Posted by Johnny630

I wonder if cards sent in for reholdered service count towards their stats of total cards graded per month?

But that shouldn't change the Pop report, unless they use a new cert #

[Johnny630]

Originally Posted by Jay Wolt

But that shouldn't change the Pop report, unless they use a new cert #

No that's SGC who does that on reholder service.