![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To Lorewalker-
The post topic was an inquiry asking for opinions(!) on why SGC doesn't make use of a set registry. I offered those opinions as part of the back and forth on topic. I am not at all interested in "asking PSA if the buck was worth the bang" for a number of reasons, most directly that I don't care one bit about their registry. Perhaps you could do that for us and report back in, say, a decade when you get a reply? While I did float an eye roll toward a couple commenters' free PSA on behalf of PSA- see what I did there?- it wasn't the point of the post. Trent King |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the registry plays little role in rare sets or superstar cards in low or mid grade, but it has entirely created the market for high grade commons and stars. Registry or having the best single is the only reason a 10 outsells a 9; I've yet to meet a single collector that can reliably separate 8/9/10 slabbed cards without seeing the slip. A mint Mantle was worth more than an EX Mantle before PSA, but the multiplier has skyrocketed and half the high grades are effectively imaginary.
Adding a registry wouldn't suddenly make SGC competitive; but it's one of the things you need to be competitive. Somebody will need to do something innovative to take over PSA, but they will also need 'the basics' and the infrastructure that PSA has to take over significant market share. SGC has never seemed to have much interest in competing, or is a poorly run business. I'm not sure which. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
3. Customer acknowledges and agrees that SGC’s owners and employees shall be permitted to submit items for grading and/or authentication without limitation. Furthermore, SGC’s owners and employees may buy, sell, and trade SGC authenticated or graded items without limitation. Not exactly third party grading.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 03-22-2023 at 06:36 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() The holders often present well and I would maybe consider them if they just sold the holders, but as is every graded card I get I liberate and I have never submitted a single card, nor will I. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 03-22-2023 at 06:52 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lorewalker- No more false friendliness, eh? Whatever. I'm sure you're
a real sweetheart in person yourself. One thing I am capable of doing, however, is staying on point. There was nothing provocative at all about my original response, it was 2 suggestions directly in line with the original question. You replied with snark, then lashed out when I didn't back off. Typical attitude, attention span, and value of contribution! Trent King |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Everything is fine. There's no issue with conflicts of interest. Or switching to random certs once people started using certs to ID patterns in submitters and find more altered cards. Or shutting down their auto business after that completely fake Marquard fiasco. Or eliminating the guarantee because they have approved so much crap. There's no problem, stop questioning the basis for peoples investments. Money printer go brrrrrr
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA is knee deep in conflicts of interest too. Hard to know between SGC and PSA which is more compromised. Very hard to support either one, presently.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Registry | Copa7 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-07-2019 10:21 AM |
GAI Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-06-2005 09:12 AM |
Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-19-2005 11:59 AM |
set registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-08-2005 07:28 AM |
SGC Set Registry II | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-13-2003 01:27 AM |