SGC Registry – Why isn’t there one?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Lorewalker

And it appeared the whole reason they changed the cert number process was to add more anonymity to submissions to prevent tracking of cards within a submission. At the same time they removed the G from SGC...no more guaranty.

Moves that to me seem to point to a company who is not looking out for their base.

In any other business, circling the wagons to protect bad actors and insulate the company from liability might draw some harsh consumer response. Not this effed up one.

[G1911]

Because SGC management acts as if keeping PSA #1 in the industry is at the top of its priority list

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

In any other business, circling the wagons to protect bad actors and insulate the company from liability might draw some harsh consumer response. Not this effed up one.

The degree of denial, indifference or tolerance that collectors have is impressive but not in a good way. What elephant in the room, he exclaims, when there are 9 of them.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Lorewalker

The degree of denial, indifference or tolerance that collectors have is impressive but not in a good way. What elephant in the room, he exclaims, when there are 9 of them.

Orlando, Sloan, Turner and Forman read the room very well -- the ostrich act during the scandal worked to perfection. Not even the elephant in the room is visible when your head is buried in the sand, now is it?

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Orlando, Sloan, Turner and Forman read the room very well -- the ostrich act during the scandal worked to perfection. Not even the elephant in the room is visible when your head is buried in the sand, now is it?

Seems to be it is the prefect crime because the appearance is that there are no victims. Almost unanimous acceptance that this is just the way it is.