WW3 Please SAY NO!

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

As we discussed, I think we basically agreed, with perhaps some nuance of difference about one or two clauses, that the text of the law read literally was fairly neutral. Where we differed was that I placed more emphasis on, and had more concern about, context and likely misapplication to practices I thought should be left alone.

That we did. An example of a reasoned debate.

[Carter08]

Originally Posted by G1911

That we did. An example of a reasoned debate.

The law was passed to promote support from the base of one party with a governor of that party having presidential aspirations. It has had its intended effect. Laws passed when a super majority controls all branches of a house are typically not intended to be neutral and I think the governor of Florida would not say otherwise.