They're Called Rare Backs...

[Eggoman]

I've posted these before and they are what led me to NET54, but I don't mind doing it again - IF you don't mind seeing them again!

[tedzan]

Four more....





.




.







TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[MVSNYC]

Luke, those HOF rare backs are ridiculous! Bravo!

[Rhotchkiss]

There are some AMAZING cards on this thread.

[boneheadandrube]

Awesome cards Luke! I've shown this one before:
M101-4 Green Joyce Sisler SGC 4.5.jpg

[Jobu]

My take is that off back has become popular with people doing binder sets and aiming to have them be anything but Piedmont or Sweet Cap. Not too many people want to have the true rare backs in a binder, so I think the off back generally has cards split into three groups without any real groups of the backs beyond "rare": 1) Piedmont/Sweet Cap, 2) Off backs = Tougher than Piedmont/Sweet Cap up to Hindu, 3) Rare backs = Hindu and tougher.

And here are some of mine that would fall into that rare category.

[Jobu]

And for Ted.

[jggames]

Originally Posted by Jobu

My take is that off back has become popular with people doing binder sets and aiming to have them be anything but Piedmont or Sweet Cap. Not too many people want to have the true rare backs in a binder, so I think the off back generally has cards split into three groups without any real groups of the backs beyond "rare": 1) Piedmont/Sweet Cap, 2) Off backs = Tougher than Piedmont/Sweet Cap up to Hindu, 3) Rare backs = Hindu and tougher.

And here are some of mine that would fall into that rare category.

I may be an exception to the rare backs in binders. Here's one of my favorite pages out of my set...if only I could find a Konetchy Red Hindu or BL460 to round the backs out.