![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do not rip. That card is destroyed by wax (and likely oil).
__________________
JunkWaxGems - Showcasing the rare, little-known and sometimes mysterious cards of the 1980s and 1990s. https://junkwaxgems.wordpress.com/ Oddball, promos and variations:http://www.comc.com/Users/JunkWaxGems,sr |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a buyer if you are selling.
Let me know, thanks! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This, the odds you’ll get a 10 off the bottom of that pack are around 0, unless one has a bribe for the grader or incriminating pictures.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
+1
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It looks by the transparency of the wrapper that that was stored in a garage or attic and experienced heat of such a magnitude the wax in the paper became wet causing saturation. The card itself is ruined as the cardboard will very likely be stained and discolored. The pack damage will certainly affect grading but at least they will not call it a reseal and a Matty collector will still want it. Taking the card out would be be a waste.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If the gum doesn’t move, good chance that it bled thru 4-5cards also, besides the Mattingly card having wax stains. They used a little different gum than topps, and this is common. Unfortunately the best thing is to leave sealed.
|
![]() |
|
|