Will Jaimet contact info

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

LOL I am surprised he lasted this long. As if it wasn't entirely predictable.

Always ends the same way, though this guy was oh so close to at least admitting it. As is his posts strongly imply he is guilty of all charges, which I guess is why the PWCC conspiracy theorists haven't showed up to proclaim PWCC's innocence.

I must say the terrorism did throw me for a loop. That was the line I didn't see coming. Angry explosion, yes. Terrorism, no!

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by G1911

Always ends the same way, though this guy was oh so close to at least admitting it. As is his posts strongly imply he is guilty of all charges, which I guess is why the PWCC conspiracy theorists haven't showed up to proclaim PWCC's innocence.

I must say the terrorism did throw me for a loop. That was the line I didn't see coming. Angry explosion, yes. Terrorism, no!

At the beginning of the internet, in the old usenet groups, there was a concept called Godwin's law if memory serves that when someone invoked the Nazis or their leader, it was time to close the thread. Same probably applies to calling people terrorists.

[Fred]

I didn't see a post where he indicated he was going to stop posting. I guess it must be in another thread I haven't read (completely).

Just curious, if he did admit to all of the misgivings, would anybody here trust him? If I read an admission of guilt, I'd say:

"good for you - you're probably still an asshole and I wouldn't trust you as far as Ben, Pete, Stan, Greg or some other poster in this thread could throw you because I wouldn't want to soil my hands trying...."

But that's just me...

[Fred]

Oh, forgot to indicate in the previous post... dang-it, this could have been one of those interesting train wreck threads. Can this guy even come close to redeeming himself?

[JollyElm]

Swilljaimet
The garbage a scandalous member wants everyone to swallow as he dodges legitimate questions about his integrity and starts playing the victim in a thread he started in a silly attempt at damage control.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Fred

I didn't see a post where he indicated he was going to stop posting. I guess it must be in another thread I haven't read (completely).

Just curious, if he did admit to all of the misgivings, would anybody here trust him? If I read an admission of guilt, I'd say:

"good for you - you're probably still an asshole and I wouldn't trust you as far as Ben, Pete, Stan, Greg or some other poster in this thread could throw you because I wouldn't want to soil my hands trying...."

But that's just me...

He said this morning in the other thread, in his funniest line, "Alright, I don’t argue with terrorists anymore. I said my piece on here. Hit me up if anyone needs anything. Enjoy trashing my name while I ignore this site moving forward." So he said he won't be back. We'll see. Hilarious either way.

More seriously for just a moment - I still wouldn't trust the person, but I would have some respect for them for admitting it. It's hard for people to admit their faults in general, and to publicly have to say "forgive me for I have sinned", with links to ones criminal record and nasty clickbait articles on the screen, that's rough. I would never do business with them, but I think that if someone in Jaimet's shoes said "I'm really unhappy about the personal insults from SCR, but I did do X and Y and Z and it was very wrong of me" would earn some genuine respect. Those who admit what they have done and acknowledge it is wrong, are better than those who don't admit or insist it wasn't wrong (or blame their acts on PSA's ineptitude).

[Fred]

Originally Posted by G1911

He said this morning in the other thread, in his funniest line, "Alright, I don’t argue with terrorists anymore. I said my piece on here. Hit me up if anyone needs anything. Enjoy trashing my name while I ignore this site moving forward." So he said he won't be back. We'll see. Hilarious either way.

More seriously for just a moment - I still wouldn't trust the person, but I would have some respect for them for admitting it. It's hard for people to admit their faults in general, and to publicly have to say "forgive me for I have sinned", with links to ones criminal record and nasty clickbait articles on the screen, that's rough. I would never do business with them, but I think that if someone in Jaimet's shoes said "I'm really unhappy about the personal insults from SCR, but I did do X and Y and Z and it was very wrong of me" would earn some genuine respect. Those who admit what they have done and acknowledge it is wrong, are better than those who don't admit or insist it wasn't wrong (or blame their acts on PSA's ineptitude).

You're right, if someone can admit past transgressions like this and own them, then there is room for a little bit of respect. But, I still wouldn't trust him as far as you can throw him.

I wonder what the expectation was when the original post was made.

[chalupacollects]

Is this step 1 of 12 seeking redemption?

[brianp-beme]

Originally Posted by chalupacollects

Is this step 1 of 12 seeking redemption?

Give me 24 hours to respond to that.

Brian (currently on step negative 2)

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by Fred

You're right, if someone can admit past transgressions like this and own them, then there is room for a little bit of respect. But, I still wouldn't trust him as far as you can throw him.



I wonder what the expectation was when the original post was made.

I think he was just trolling for dollars. I guarantee there is at least one poor old fart from this site that sent him an email.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

[Eric72]

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg

I think he was just trolling for dollars. I guarantee there is at least one poor old fart from this site that sent him an email.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Wasn't that a TV show back in the '70s? Seemingly ordinary people with big balls trying to get money for nothing...

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

At the beginning of the internet, in the old usenet groups, there was a concept called Godwin's law if memory serves that when someone invoked the Nazis or their leader, it was time to close the thread. Same probably applies to calling people terrorists.

The additional humor to me is that it is Jaimet that has a criminal conviction for the use of a weapon in an assault incident. I assume none of the people he has referred to as terrorists have violent felonies on their record.

I get some of the sentiment, the SCR article is personally and needlessly nasty. But every time someone comes on to publicly defend their honor - they proceed to do the things that do NOT help their goal. Every one of these people has the same personality.