Which iconic set had the best sequel?

[thatkidfromjerrymaguire]

When I saw this thread I opened it with the intention to vote for 1952 Bowman…but it’s not even an option!

1951 Bowman is certainly an iconic set (great artwork, larger format than previous Bowman releases, and the two biggest post war rookie cards).

And some say that 1952 artwork is even better, and the faux autographs replacing the box letters make them look a little more elegant.

Where’s the love?

[darwinbulldog]

'53 Topps was an easy choice in light of my opinion that T206 is much more attractive than T205, 1933 Goudey is moderately more attractive than 1934 Goudey (and has 4 more Ruths), and 1953 Topps is significantly more attractive than 1952 Topps.

[skelly423]

Originally Posted by thatkidfromjerrymaguire

When I saw this thread I opened it with the intention to vote for 1952 Bowman…but it’s not even an option!

1951 Bowman is certainly an iconic set (great artwork, larger format than previous Bowman releases, and the two biggest post war rookie cards).

And some say that 1952 artwork is even better, and the faux autographs replacing the box letters make them look a little more elegant.

Where’s the love?

As one commenter astutely pointed out, every Bowman set from ‘49 to’53 has a great claim to being the best sequel. I focused on the conventional big 3 when I asked the question, but you’re right that the 1952 Bowman belongs on this list.