Should Some Interference Be Allowed In The BST Areas?

[Leon]

In case anyone didn't surmise the end result of this thread. The BST rule of no interference is staying in place. As the RULES state, if there is any fraud or factually incorrect information in a BST thread, it can still be posted about. Just like before.
I think it would be a shitshow if we allowed the interference we are speaking of, and I don't want to babysit the BST 24 hours a day.

and a card
.

[cubman1941]

Agree and thanks Leon.

[doug.goodman]

Originally Posted by Leon

In case anyone didn't surmise the end result of this thread. The BST rule of no interference is staying in place. As the RULES state, if there is any fraud or factually incorrect information in a BST thread, it can still be posted about. Just like before.
I think it would be a shitshow if we allowed the interference we are speaking of, and I don't want to babysit the BST 24 hours a day.

and a card
.

Seems like a case of good old fashioned "don't fix what's not broke", thanx Leon.

And a "card"

[Leon]

Originally Posted by doug.goodman

Seems like a case of good old fashioned "don't fix what's not broke", thanx Leon.

And a "card"

For me, it's not only don't fix what isn't broken, but also, if it's not a large improvement, it usually shouldn't be done. Who likes change?
and every rule has to be managed, so I still believe in fewer are better, or I would have to work more.

It was a valid subject to discuss.

and another card



.