![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: If I submitted this T206 Cy Young to SGC, what grade would it get on a crossover? | |||
SGC 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 58.70% |
SGC 1.5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 41.30% |
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why in the world is PSA not standing behind their prior work? I know, things change, grading evolves, yadda yadda.
It’s all about the money. Sounds very similar to me to a CEO disclaiming the work done by staff, vowing to review and update what has been done...for a price. JMHO. Peace out.
__________________
T206 156/518 second time around R312 49/50 1959 Topps 568/572 1958, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1957, 1956… ...whatever I want |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
⚾️ Successful transactions with: npa589, OhioCardCollector, BaseballChuck, J56baseball, Ben Yourg, helfrich91, oldjudge, tlwise12, inceptus, gfgcom, rhodeskenm, Moonlight Graham |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1. If they made an error in grading then they should be 100% responsible.
It seems some of the TPG's don't stand behind their grading any longer. Makes one wonder about it. If they don't guarantee their work they must not believe in it. I would leave the card in question alone. A different holder or grade won't make a difference in value, imo. Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 12-21-2022 at 08:51 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would leave that card alone. With those creases in the card, I have no idea why it got the half point bump that it did. Let some label chaser pay the premium.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If your intention is to sell the card, then you might want to stick with PSA to receive the highest resale value. But you roll the dice on having the grade drop half a point. You know this game, it depends on how the grader feels that day. If you're going to keep it, then why bother with the reholder. If you are a collector that has to have it in a holder and it's not for resale, then send it to SGC, however the grading fee may be higher than the PSA reholder fee and you run the same risk of the grader having a good or bad day.
![]() If it were mine, I'd keep it as is.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for the replies everyone! I am going to keep it as is in the PSA holder for now. It's for my personal collection and I have no intention of selling so I don't really care if it's PSA or SGC or dinged case or not (although the ding in the case bothers me on occasion).
I just like the rich coloring on the front and back and that it's an off back Cy Young.
__________________
⚾️ Successful transactions with: npa589, OhioCardCollector, BaseballChuck, J56baseball, Ben Yourg, helfrich91, oldjudge, tlwise12, inceptus, gfgcom, rhodeskenm, Moonlight Graham |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Cy Young portrait Old Mill very tough SGC 10 - $1900 | t206kid | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 07-28-2021 10:31 AM |
FS: T206 Cy Young Glove Shows Old Mill PSA 2.5 | Cards2121 | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 12-21-2017 08:37 PM |
FS: Incredibly Tough T206 Cy Young Old Mill Portrait | btcarfagno | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-07-2016 02:25 PM |
FS: T206 Cy Young SGC 88 / T206 Kid Elberfeld (Wash.) Old Mill PSA 6 | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 8 | 06-09-2014 04:34 PM |
T206 Old Mill Cy Young Portrait Card PSA2 | goodnightnow | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-16-2009 05:25 PM |