|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wouldn't say 2 cards under 30 years old is a recency bias at all.
I might quibble with the list here and there but overall I think it's correct. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Not sure where the magic of 30 years comes from, but I would probably cast a wider net when it comes to recency when discussing a hobby that is at/approaching 150 years old now.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel Last edited by raulus; 11-29-2022 at 10:10 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think of 6 as newer cards too.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
LeBron on the list with Russell, Kareem, Namath, Orr and Howe off ??
I would even give Wilt the nod over him. At least Barry Bonds wasn't mentioned. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think his list is perfect. I would place the exact same cards probably in the exact same order if I were to come up with my list blind. Even his honorable mentions are spot on. Well done, I say. Solid list.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Third year Jackie Robinson card(and not as rare as his cards from previous years) and Leaf was as much a regional issue as Swell and Bond cards. Not a visually attractive card either.
So, the Leaf card is not his rookie card, not rare, and not visually appealing. What makes it iconic other than being iconically mistaken as his rookie card and iconically being mistaken as being made in 1948? Without those iconic mistakes pounded into people's heads, it wouldn't sniff the list. Third year Jordan card(and not as rare as his Star Co. cards). This card is quite attractive.
__________________
http://originaloldnewspapers.com |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jerome Walton was a big card deal, but did Upper Deck set up extra printings of just his card to cash in? Griffey was the #1 card even then. Just not by the margin it is today
PSA POP reports are not reflective whatsoever of popularity in 1989. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CAN WE SOLVE THIS HOBBY (SPORTS CARD) CRISIS? Video and Discussion | parkplace33 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 108 | 11-08-2022 07:44 PM |
| Cards becoming iconic | polakoff | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 6 | 03-07-2021 05:51 PM |
| Iconic cards | Jcfowler6 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 03-26-2018 06:52 PM |
| best net 54 threads of alltime? | milkit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 98 | 06-29-2016 12:45 PM |
| OT: Great video of sports history | DanP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-13-2011 09:22 PM |