Any interest in an SGC piggyback submission? CLOSED!! Grades popped!!

[todeen]

The 1933 Gehrig is mine. It was previously judged as altered by SGC. My valuation was correct according to VCP for that card in Auth condition. Do you know why they upcharged me?

Sent from my SM-G9900 using Tapatalk

[Casey2296]

Originally Posted by todeen

The 1933 Gehrig is mine. It was previously judged as altered by SGC. My valuation was correct according to VCP for that card in Auth condition. Do you know why they upcharged me?

Sent from my SM-G9900 using Tapatalk

Maybe you got a numerical grade this time.

[todeen]

Originally Posted by Casey2296

Maybe you got a numerical grade this time.

I sent it in the cardsaver with their sticker attached to it. I just wanted the card slabbed and protected. If they changed their opinion after seeing their previous opinion I would be surprised.

Sent from my SM-G9900 using Tapatalk

[Casey2296]

That would surprise me too

[Tyruscobb]

Originally Posted by todeen

I sent it in the cardsaver with their sticker attached to it. I just wanted the card slabbed and protected. If they changed their opinion after seeing their previous opinion I would be surprised.

Sent from my SM-G9900 using Tapatalk

I remember this card. The seller guaranteed a numerical grade, and it came back authentic. The seller then refused any refund (partial or full) and Leon banned him. Funny how things come back around.

I'm confused why you wouldn't put it in a different card saver - you had nothing to lose and everything to gain. There is no way SGC would give it a numerical grade after seeing that it previously gave it an A.

However, if you had removed the prior label, there is a chance SGC would grade it a 1. What was your logic in simply resubmitting it with the SGC A label still attached?

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by Tyruscobb

I remember this card. The seller guaranteed a numerical grade, and it came back authentic. The seller then refused any refund (partial or full) and Leon banned him. Funny how things come back around.

I'm confused why you wouldn't put it in a different card saver - you had nothing to lose and everything to gain. There is no way SGC would give it a numerical grade after seeing that it previously gave it an A.

However, if you had removed the prior label, there is a chance SGC would grade it a 1. What was your logic in simply resubmitting it with the SGC A label still attached?

I took it out of that card saver. I put it in a fresh blank one. I wanted him to have a fresh chance at a number grade. I may slip up from time to time, but for the most part, I know what I am doing.

[Tyruscobb]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

I took it out of that card saver. I put it in a fresh blank one. I wanted him to have a fresh chance at a number grade. I may slip up from time to time, but for the most part, I know what I am doing.

Bobby to the rescue!

If it comes back a numerical grade, and not just Authentic, the submitter owes you a nice Christmas gift as you will have significantly increased his card's value.

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by Tyruscobb

Bobby to the rescue!

If it comes back a numerical grade, and not just Authentic, the submitter owes you a nice Christmas gift as you will have significantly increased his card's value.

It didn't. It came back AUHENTIC only. At least they are consistent.

[todeen]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

I took it out of that card saver. I put it in a fresh blank one. I wanted him to have a fresh chance at a number grade. I may slip up from time to time, but for the most part, I know what I am doing.

I appreciate that. I really have no experience submitting, but I had a bunch of cards I wanted slabbed for protection if nothing else. Thanks for all you do!