![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To that point, what is the actual or perceived value difference outside the mainstream accepted variations. A Ty Cobb T206 with a Ty Cobb back will bring more money than a Piedmont as it is known that there are very few examples out there. If there is not an acknowledgment of fewer of a variant print running, is the value going to hold up, or is it something that only true collectors will know/value?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The grading companies wield WAY too much power related to the question. It is by them grading the different variants as such that a "pop report" can be developed which can then be used to "prove" relative scarcity and justify higher values.
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amen to that. And good luck convincing them to recognize a new variant!
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a lot of fun collecting "unrecognized" variants precisely because they are cheap. People mostly only care about the Standard Catalog and what PSA chooses selectively to be cognizant of. Makes it fun to get the hard ones that they don't include, for low prices.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I totally agree!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree with this which makes it interesting for the 1952 Topps variation collectors. It is hard to believe they do not recognize some of the well known "printing" variations like the '52 Campos border break, etc.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This x1000. The Blank Back Satchel Paige Leaf that's been on ebay for a while is _very_ interesting, but it's not reflected in the SGC pop report (as a "pop 1", I assume). I reached out to SGC, to see if they would consider carving that card off the main pop report; they said they would think about it, but it never happened. That one simple act would bump up the value quite a bit imo.
__________________
IG: venezuelan_league_stickers |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Non-mainstream rookie cards etc. | Peter_Spaeth | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 12 | 08-06-2019 10:24 AM |
Basketball HOF'er with no mainstream RC | shagrotn77 | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 4 | 02-24-2017 06:43 PM |
Players Not in mainstream sets. | Bruinsfan94 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 11-28-2011 07:04 AM |
Mainstream vs. Scarce Rookie Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-06-2007 06:43 PM |
Which non-mainstream sets have been completed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-15-2006 01:57 PM |