After paying their dues, should hobbyists who committed fraud be allowed back ?

[Oscar_Stanage]

Originally Posted by JustinD

I like this…”remorseful”

Story time…

20+ years ago I was selling on eBay to fund my life during my first cancer surgery. I must have had at least 50-100 listings up at the time. One unknowingly to me as I really did not know, was a forged Mantle signature. The only autoed item in 100 listings. Obviously, I was not an autograph seller.

That listing was posted on the board and I was called out as a scammer, forger and just about everything possible by numerous well known members. I don’t take it personally because I knew jack shit about autos at the time (I’ve gained a little over the past 20 years but still have only a starting base).

What didn’t happen was one person sending me a message on eBay to inform me, I saw the post almost a decade later searching my ID. The true backstory is that I sold it, the seller found it fake and I refunded the entire amount with an apology. Well before eBay required refunds. Lesson learned, happy buyer and I was remorseful for selling a bad item.

However, if you google search my 5000+ Feedback and 100% positive eBay ID, I sell forgeries. So, yes…I like second chances. ( I know many of those we talk about were convicted of actual crimes, but not all.)

Justin, with all due respect, this was not even fraud.

[G1911]

Let's use a recent example. It looks like Paul Slapnicker still isn't banned. Why? Does anyone think this fraudster might improve the place or provide anything of value?

[raulus]

Originally Posted by G1911

Let's use a recent example. It looks like Paul Slapnicker still isn't banned. Why? Does anyone think this fraudster might improve the place or provide anything of value?

You mean beyond hilarious comedic value?

[G1911]

Originally Posted by raulus

You mean beyond hilarious comedic value?

I get allowing them to post for a couple days to have fun with the comedy train, because that was hilarious. But fraudsters are allowed already as our last one appears to still be unbanned after the comedy was had.

[Leon]

He was only allowed on in the first place to defend himself. He tried and failed miserably. My mistake on not putting him back in the banned bucket. He is now.

Originally Posted by G1911

Let's use a recent example. It looks like Paul Slapnicker still isn't banned. Why? Does anyone think this fraudster might improve the place or provide anything of value?

[Bestdj777]

Leon,

I don’t think it’s a black and white call and tend to think you’ve run things very well here and are a good judge of character. I know there is at least one former convict on here that has paid his dues, is a huge asset to the hobby now, and continually tried to make things better. He should certainly be on here.

Chris

[JustinD]

Originally Posted by Oscar_Stanage

Justin, with all due respect, this was not even fraud.

Agreed, it was not. However, in zeal at the time it was portrayed as such. I guess I am looking at it in a personal view. I am thinking some situations we don’t know all the facts.

I have been here quite a long time and I trust the group to handle their self-preservation. Although, that may be a poor assumption as many folks have been scammed by what seemed somewhat obvious things of late (I am NOT victim blaming or insulting people, just stating a personal observation.) I liked the idea earlier of no BST access…as that is not a possibility per Leon, I am getting convinced by the crowd that perhaps it is best to have it be No.