![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1963 Fleer is a nice non-Topps set.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm with Phil- 1963 Fleer. Not a huge set, cool look, cool players.
Trent King |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's hard to go wrong with Fleer. You get some Greats either way.
Only downside to 63 is the checklist. It cost me more to get that one than any other card. Mays, Koufax and Clemente were all cheaper. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would also go with 63 Fleer but I do like the 61/62 Greats. I also like the colorless 60 Leafs which involves some tough variations and proof test cards . Does anyone else collect the marble variations ? ( only kidding )
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I love the Leaf's. I have put together a series 1 set, the second series is pretty darn tough and I haven't started it yet. The roster of players in it is pretty weak, but that's not a bad thing for the set building wallet. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1 I'd go '63 Fleer as well.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The checklist is one of those formerly crazy cool cards that you would never get a glimpse of, because it was so rare. Now, you can see a bunch of them anytime you want on eBay. Big bummer.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jello. Player selection.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's at least a cute checklist if it's going to be the key card it might as well be a bit less boring than the 57 Topps ones that cost $$$$.
The Adcock it replaced on the sheet is pretty cheap still, last I looked. I did my set for like $150 at a snails pace between 2006 and 2019. Fleer re-used the design for a full set in 2003 that was pretty cool. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Laughlin World Series?
Jell-O was a smart answer.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Post Cereal and ‘67 Dexter Press for player selection. I’d vote for 1967 Kahn’s but for the fact that they consist of very few teams.
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I also like the 1969 Nabisco set, it has all of the HOF'ers, the images are so gritty and raw, reminiscent of the times in America in 1969. Very cool set.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1960s - 1970s Topps/OPC Hockey 500+ Lot Commons, Stars 1979 Topps Set w/no Gretzky | jbsports33 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 04-16-2021 11:01 AM |
FS 1960s Topps HOF Rookies SGC 6.5 | awise1187 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 10-22-2020 05:43 PM |
WTB 1960s Topps in Ex/Mt or better (ungraded) | dgo71 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 10 | 02-06-2020 02:33 AM |
WTB- certain 1960s signed topps | theshleps | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 02-19-2019 02:08 PM |
Need Help On Value: Mostly 1960s Topps Lot | bundy462 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 03-20-2012 01:25 PM |