![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I got one in VG-EX on eBay a couple of years ago that was incorrectly listed as a 1963 Topps Error but still had to pay close to $100 to be the high bidder. I don’t think I’ve seen one since, very scarce. I saw a high grade one sell for $750 years ago on eBay. ETA, I think it’s related to the 1967 Topps Aurelio Monteagudo-Dick Howser missing border print errors, they were all on the same 5th Series sheet and are equally very scarce.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 10-28-2022 at 08:18 PM. Reason: Addition |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes those are tough too. Is the Schofield related as well ?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Been on my want list for awhile, they are tough to locate.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, I should have noted the Schofield as part of the Monteagudo-Howser print error combo.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can't believe I've never seen that one. I blame Al for not keeping me up to date.
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Schofield/Monteagudo/Howser were in columns 4, 5, & 6 in the print row headed by Bob Johnson. The card to the left of Schofield is Walker (448) and the card to the right of Howser is Lou Johnson (410). Nen is in column 10 of a completely row. This row was headed by the 5th series checklist. Nen is sandwiched between Pete Ward (436) and Tiant (377). The card above him on the sheet in all 3 cases is Cards Rookies (384). I doubt that the Nen error is related to the others but perhaps there is a Tiant, Ward, or Cards Rookies missing black error lurking to be discovered?? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There goes Kev again. Clouding the issue with facts
:-) Howard— looks like several people know about and want your card Last edited by ALR-bishop; 10-29-2022 at 07:45 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the input guys! I am making an effort to get PSA to recognize and grade this as such. The card ultimately will be for sale but have a bit more due diligence to do on it first. Feel free to PM me if interested when it is available.
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. Last edited by hcv123; 10-29-2022 at 02:49 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it is just another print defect, but a good one, and in earlier days the hobby did recognize the Spezio. Good luck Howard, we variant fans are rooting for you
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1967 Topps 6th Series Checklist variation Wanted to Buy | deweyinthehall | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 07-24-2022 08:18 AM |
New 1967 Variation!!! | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 31 | 06-29-2015 08:41 AM |
1967 Topps Baseball #500 Marichal variation | variation-man | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 08-20-2014 07:47 PM |
1967 Phillies Rookies Variation | Gr8Beldini | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 10-03-2013 03:16 PM |
New Minor 1967 Variation | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-22-2013 02:11 PM |