![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA 1:
Seaver $415 Ryan $443 PSA 1.5: Seaver $603 Ryan $434 PSA 2: Seaver $823 Ryan $465 PSA 2.5: Seaver $576 Ryan $540 PSA 3: Seaver $928 Ryan $580 PSA 3.5: Seaver $730 Ryan $664 PSA 4: Seaver $1046 Ryan $859 PSA 4.5: Seaver $1183 Ryan $924 PSA 5: Seaver $1217 Ryan $1049 PSA 5.5: Seaver $1225 Ryan $1285 PSA 6: Seaver $1598 Ryan $1636 PSA 6.5: Seaver $1680 Ryan $2348 PSA 7: Seaver $2130 Ryan $2843 PSA 7.5: Seaver $3250 Ryan $4171 PSA 8: Seaver $4303 Ryan $7511 PSA 8.5: Seaver $7975 Ryan $21,690 PSA 9: Seaver $18,924 Ryan $108,034 PSA 10: Seaver $344,400 Ryan $600,000 Last edited by bobsbbcards; 10-15-2022 at 10:24 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And to think the Mets traded both of them for Jim Fregosi, Steve Henderson, Pat Zachry, and Doug Flynn.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Though I came of age during the time that the '68 Ryan card was skyrocketing in the early 1990's, I had started collecting 5+ years earlier, and from my reading already up to that point in time, I knew inherently somehow that the '67 Denehy / Seaver was the more difficult card due to it's series placement and scarcity. Interesting that when I first started buying packs in 1986 - Nolan Ryan was considered a good pitcher, but I think pretty much everyone would have agreed at the time that Seaver was better. Here nearly 40 years later - the card world aside, and the sports world (as evidenced by debates on social media, etc.) would seem to think just about the opposite.
I guess the Seaver RC has always been so appealing to me because it checks both the baseball greatness and baseball card greatness boxes. First ballot HOF'er, iconic pitcher who was likely the greatest of his generation. And from a card perspective, a single print high number in what was likely the most popular set of the decade of the 1960's.
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-15-2022 at 01:37 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was a weekend show dealer in the late 80's on Long Island with a friend of mine and while I can't pinpoint the exact year, around 1988 there was a big uptick in business on Ryan cards and we could not keep them in stock at all. It was kind of organic as I recall, there was no overt event that triggered it.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow great stuff from the guys who remember collecting these cards when they first came out. Love hearing those stories.
I wasn’t born until the 70s. I remember when Ryan madness hit in the late 80s and I also recall it being quite sudden. For all intents, Ryan cards took the handoff from Mickey Mantle in the late 60s and his card became kind of the default most valuable non rookie card in the set by around 73, once series stopped being issued. But this didn’t happen until 1988 or so as the previous poster said. I think it’s the whole Texas tough image. And his cards are all with the exception of his RC have great eye appeal. It’s as if he knew what made a great baseball card or something. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 72 Ryan 6.5, 68 Seaver 6.5, 70 Rose 8.5 | joshleon | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-07-2022 06:12 PM |
WTB 60s and 70s RCs Seaver Ryan Schmidt more | Peter_Spaeth | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 7 | 01-22-2016 05:48 PM |
Mets - Martin, Ryan, Seaver | Touch'EmAll | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 05-28-2015 12:48 PM |
Seaver and Ryan RCs - trimmed? | rkrolewicz | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 11-02-2014 05:11 PM |
Mantle, Reese, Seaver, Ryan etc | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-12-2008 10:08 AM |